28 U.S.C. § 139
Times for holding regular sessions
The times for commencing regular sessions of the district court for transacting judicial business at the places fixed by this chapter shall be determined by the rules or orders of the court. Such rules or orders may provide that at one or more of such places the court shall be in continuous session for such purposes on all business days throughout the year. At other places a session of the court shall continue for such purposes until terminated by order of final adjournment or by commencement of the next regular session at the same place.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison
United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison (1980)
“For example, Congress has provided for the times of regular sessions of the district court “for transacting judicial business at the places fixed by this chapter” ( 28 U.S.C. § 139 ) (emphasis supplied), for adjournment of any regular session “by order made anywhere within its…”
Broadway National Bank v. Plano Encryption Technologies, LLC (2016)
“To the extent other district courts have found venue proper based solely on the receipt of a cease-and-desist letter, these cases were de *480 cided before 28 U.S.C. § 139 1(b)(2) was amended and are therefore inapplicable.”
1000 Friends of Wisconsin Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation (2017)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 139 (d)(8)(A) (“all Federal permits and reviews .”
McDermott v. Bb&t Bank Corporation (2017)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 139 . No Defendant resides in this judicial district, see id.”
Kramer v. Pittstown Point Landings, Ltd. (1986)
“Since this action “is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship,” it may be brought “only in the judicial district where all defendants reside, or in which the claim arose, except as otherwise provided by law.”
Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System (2021)
“Nonetheless, Plaintiff erroneously cites to, which the Court disregards, 28 U.S.C. § 139 (b)(2), a statutory provision that does not exist, and 28 U.”
Kellam v. Hess (2023)
“28 U.S.C. § 139 (b) [sic]; and I caught hepititus [sic]; 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.