28 U.S.C. § 1410
Venue of cases ancillary to foreign proceedings
2005—Pub. L. 109–8 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to venue of cases commenced under section 304 of title 11.
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 66
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Haarhuis v. Kunnan Enterprises, Ltd.
Haarhuis v. Kunnan Enterprises, Ltd. (1999)
“We do not read either of these cases as addressing the jurisdictional issue before us in this case but rather the venue requirements in 28 U.S.C. § 1410 . 28 U.”
Petition of Brierley (1992)
“The nexus to which I referred in Gee is satisfied by the venue requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1410 . Just as there is little reason to exclude a foreign debtor ineligible for chapter 11 relief from being the subject of an ancillary proceeding, there is equally little reason to…”
Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (2013)
“§ 1528 and 28 U.S.C. § 1410 . Section 1528 states that “[a]fter recognition of a foreign main proceeding, a case under another chapter of this title may be commenced only if the debtor has assets in the United States.”
In Re Board of Directors of Hopewell International Insurance (2002)
“§ 304 are set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1410 , which contains three subsections.”
In re Suntech Power Holdings Co. (2014)
“The dispute regarding recognition centers on three issues: (1) is the Debtor eligible to be a debtor under Bankruptcy Code § 109(a); (2) is venue proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1410 ; and (3) is the Cayman Islands the Debtor’s center of main interests (“COMI”)?…”
Metzeler v. Bouchard Transportation Co. (In Re Metzeler) (1987)
“§§ 1334 ,157 and venue is claimed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1410 . Nowhere is it asserted that Uni-Petrol has leviable property in the United States.”
In Re Board of Directors of Hopewell International Insurance (1999)
“This is said to be so because the action whose commencement Hopewell seeks to enjoin can only be asserted by Gold Medal in Minnesota, thereby restricting Hopewell’s choice of venue to Minnesota pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1410 (a). Hopewell takes the contrary position, arguing that…”
Evans v. Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft (In Re Petition of Evans) (1995)
“Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1410 Section 1410 governs the venue of an ancillary proceeding, and Hancock bases its motion on the “plain meaning” of this statute.”
In Re Abc Learning Centres Ltd. (2011)
“Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1410 . The Debtors’ petition for recognition of a foreign proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.”
Lipshie v. AM Cable TV Industries, Inc. (In Re Geauga Trenching Corp.) (1990)
“…U.S.C. § 1408 , 11 28 U.S.C. § 1410 , 12 28 U.S.C. *651 § 1409, and, 28 U.S.C. § 1412 , we co”
In re Ocean Rig UDW Inc. (2017)
“The venue requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1410 to maintain these chapter 15 cases in the Southern District of New York is satisfied.”
In re Berau Capital Resources Pte Ltd. (2015)
“The venue statute for chapter 15 cases, 28 U.S.C. § 1410 , permits a chapter 15 case to be filed in a district in which the debtor has its principal place of business or principal assets; and absent a place of business or assets, in a district in which there is an action or…”
— 28 U.S.C. § 1410(b) — 1 case
In Re Banco De Descuento (1987)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.