11 U.S.C. § 304
Repealed. Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, § 802(d)(3), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 146]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 207
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1932–2026 · leading case: Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Altos Hornos De Mexico, S.A. De C v. Docket No. 04-0450-Cv, 412 F.3d 418 (2d Cir. 2005).
Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Altos Hornos De Mexico, S.A. De C v. Docket No. 04-0450-Cv, 412 F.3d 418 (2d Cir. 2005). “Koreag intervened as Mebco’s successor-in-interest and moved to dismiss on international comity grounds.”
Bondi v. Capital & Fin. Asset Mgmt. S.A., 535 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2008). “Bondi, in his capacity as Extraordinary Commissioner of the Old Parmalat bankruptcy estate, petitioned the Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court to enjoin actions against the Old Parmalat estate with respect to any property involved in its Italian bankruptcy proceedings…”
Cunard S.S. Co. Ltd. v. Salen Reefer Servs. Ab, United Brands Co., Garnishee, 773 F.2d 452 (2d Cir. 1985). “Third, Cunard contends that the district court’s order contravenes the policies which underlie section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 304 (1982). Finally, the plaintiff argues that it did not receive reasonable notice of Salen’s intention to prove foreign law pursuant…”
United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc., 216 F. Supp. 2d 198 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Indeed, Congress has recognized the special considerations of bankruptcy proceedings by enacting section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 304 , which permits a representative of a foreign debt- or to file a petition “ancillary to a foreign proceeding” with a U.”
In Re Gercke, 122 B.R. 621 (D.D.C. 1991). “This is an ancillary proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 304 brought by Michael D. Gercke and Mark Homan, the administrators of Dominion International Group, Pic, (“Dominion”) pursuant to the Insolvency Act of 1986 of the United Kingdom.”
Parmalat Capital Fin. Ltd. v. Bank of Am. Corp., 639 F.3d 572 (2d Cir. 2011). “In January and June 2004 respectively, PCFL and Bondi commenced separate proceedings pursuant to former 11 U.S.C. § 304 in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.”
In Re Axona Int'l Credit & Com. Ltd., 88 B.R. 597 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988). “11 U.S.C. § 304 . “A case under Section 304 is not a full-scale bankruptcy case with an automatic stay prohibiting dismemberment of assets by vigilant creditors or with avoiding powers given to a fiduciary, be it a trustee or debtor-in-possession, to ensure equality of…”
Argo Fund Ltd. v. Bd. of Directors of Telecom Argentina, S.A. (In Re Bd. of Directors of Telecom Argentina, S.A.), 528 F.3d 162 (2d Cir. 2008). “See 11 U.S.C. § 304 , repealed on April 20, 2005, repeal effective October 17, 2005 (“section 304”).”
Hoffman v. Bullmore (In Re Nat'l Warranty Ins. Risk Retention Grp.), 306 B.R. 614 (8th Cir. BAP 2004). “Hoffman appeals from an order of the bankruptcy court 1 which granted National Warranty relief under 11 U.S.C. § 304 (b) of the Bankruptcy Code.”
Bank of New York v. Treco (In re Treco), 240 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 2001). “Treco and David Patrick Hamilton (the “Liquidators”), the liquidators of Meridien International Bank Limited (“MIBL”), a bank incorporated in the Bahamas undergoing bankruptcy proceedings there, filed a petition in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York…”
Haarhuis v. Kunnan Enter., Ltd., 177 F.3d 1007 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “The Reorganizers sought this injunction under 11 U.S.C. § 304 (“§ 304”), which allows a representative of a foreign bankruptcy or reorganization to petition a United States bankruptcy court to, inter alia, “enjoin the commencement or continuation of any action against a debtor…”
In Re Bd. of Directors of Hopewell Int'l Ins., 238 B.R. 25 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999). “OPINION ON MOTION FOR INJUNC-TIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 304 TINA L. BROZMAN, Chief Judge.”
— 11 U.S.C. § 304(c)(1) — 1 case
Interpool, Ltd. v. Certain Freights of the M/V Venture Star (In Re Dunn), 102 B.R. 373 (D.N.J. 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.