28 U.S.C. § 1493
Repealed. July 28, 1953, ch. 253, § 8, 67 Stat. 226]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case: Hadden v. United States
Hadden v. United States (1955)
“412 , was not before this court under our present jurisdictional act, but rather by reference under section 1063 of Revised Statutes, now 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1493 , 2510. In this case the plaintiff, trustee for the financial institution, is not asserting a mere equitable priority,…”
Landers v. United States (1997)
“§ 1492 , and 28 U.S.C. § 1493 (a)(3). Not one of these alleged bases for jurisdiction, however, can fairly be interpreted as mandating the payment of money damages.”
Langan v. United States (2019)
“§ 1498 ; 28 U.S.C. § 1493 ; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as the legal and jurisdictional bases for his claims.”
Langan v. United States (2019)
“§ 1498 ; 28 U.S.C. § 1493 ; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .”
Langan v. United States (2020)
“He also relied on 28 U.S.C. § 1493 , but that statute was repealed in 1953.”
Burton v. United States (2025)
“Although the Court does have limited “jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim for damages by any person unjustly convicted of an offense against the United States and imprisoned,” 28 U.S.C. § 1493 , to establish such jurisdiction a Plaintiff must allege that: (1) His…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.