28 U.S.C. § 1504
Repealed. Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 133(f), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 41]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1950–2026 · leading case: Glidden Co. v. Zdanok
Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (1962)
“844 -845 (1946), as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 1504 . In truth the District Courts have long been vested with substantial portions of the identical jurisdiction exercised by the Court of Claims.”
Williamson v. United States (1964)
“28 U.S.C. § 1504 . The present suit involves an original rather than an appellate proceeding.”
Capital Transit Co. v. United States (1950)
“28 U.S.C.A. § 1504 . The Supreme Court has said: “The Court of Claims is a legislative, not a constitutional, court.”
Soukaras v. United States (1956)
“§ 1491 (5), and 28 U. S. C. § 1504 . Title 28 U. S. C. § 2501 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Every claim of which the Court of Claims has jurisdiction shall be barred unless the petition thereon is filed, or the claim is referred by the Senate or House of…”
O'Neal Bey v. O'Neal (2022)
“§§ 1331 and 1332; a repealed provision of the United States Code, 28 U.S.C. § 1504 ; the jurisdictional provision of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.”
Nagy v. United States (2026)
“First, in the show cause order, the court explained to Plaintiff that 28 U.S.C. § 1504 , see ECF No. 1 at 1, does not provide jurisdiction because Congress repealed it in the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, ch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.