U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART V— PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 133— REVIEW—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

28 U.S.C. § 2102

Priority of criminal case on appeal from State court

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

Criminal cases on review from State courts shall have priority, on the docket of the Supreme Court, over all cases except cases to which the United States is a party and such other cases as the court may decide to be of public importance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1993–2020 · leading case: Adams v. Greiner
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adams v. Greiner (2003) nysd “Adams’s conviction became final on June 11, 2000, when the 90-day period within which, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2102 (c), he could have applied for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court expired.”
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters v. Holcroft LLC (2002) mied “28 U.S.C. § 2102 (a). 9 . Defendants may be arguing that the plant closing qualifies as a layoff extending for "any other reason” under the last sentence of § 639.”
Easter Seal Society for Disabled Children v. Berry (1993) dc “In Union National Bank , the Supreme Court observed that "[s]ince the rule [ (6(a)) ] had the concurrence of Congress, and since no contrary policy is expressed in the statute governing this review, we think that the considerations of liberality and leniency which find…”
Sandstrom v. State of New York (2020) nywd “§§ 1983 , 1985, 1986, 1988, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2102 and 2202. Dkt. 1. On February 23, 2019, this Court1 referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge Leslie G.”
Angles v. Flexible Flyer Liquidating Trust (In Re FF Acquisition Corp.) (2010) msnb “§ 2101 ), and Flexible Flyer admits that it failed to give a sixty day written layoff notice.”
Angles v. Flexible Flyer Liquidating Trust (In Re FF Acquisition Corp.) (2010) msnb “In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that Flexible Flyer failed to comply with the WARN Act by failing to give its employees a sixty day layoff notice as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2102 . Flexible Flyer does not dispute that the provisions of the WARN Act were triggered.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.