28 U.S.C. § 2514
Forfeiture of fraudulent claims
A claim against the United States shall be forfeited to the United States by any person who corruptly practices or attempts to practice any fraud against the United States in the proof, statement, establishment, or allowance thereof.
In such cases the United States Court of Federal Claims shall specifically find such fraud or attempt and render judgment of forfeiture.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 202
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1953–2025 · leading case: Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States (2013)
“The Government sought the forfeiture of KBR’s claims pursuant to a Spe- cial Plea in Fraud, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 , penalties under the AKA, 41 U.”
GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant (2013)
“V 2011)), and the Special Plea in Fraud statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (2000). 5 Defendant seeks forfeiture of plaintiffs entire camp package BPA claim under the Special Plea in Fraud statute, damages in the amount of plaintiffs unsupported claim, as well as defendant’s cost of…”
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States (2011)
“Plaintiffs motion calls into question the level of proof required for each of defendant’s five counts of fraud, implicating both statutory and common-law remedies, and, specifically, whether receipt of kickbacks from a subcontractor by employees of a prime contractor states a…”
Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States (2016)
“§§ 3729-3733 , the Forfeiture of Fraudulent Claims Act (also known as the Special Plea in Fraud), 28 U.S.C. § 2514 , and the anti-fraud provision of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.”
Supermex, Inc. v. United States (1996)
“This case comes before the court for review of defendant’s Special Plea in Fraud, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (1988 & Supp.1992), offered by defendant as a defense to plaintiffs claims, and on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the…”
Veridyne Corp. v. United States (2008)
“Defendant answered and filed its counterclaim under 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (2000), on July 31, 2006.”
Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States (2001)
“The trial court: 1) denied the Government’s motion for summary judgment which raised a special plea in fraud, based on 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (1994); 2) denied Glendale’s claim for expectancy damages because it was speculative and not proven to a reasonable certainty; 3) awarded…”
Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United States (2007)
“In addition, the court herein, holds that Plaintiff violated the Forfeiture of Fraudulent Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 , and thereby has forfeited claims in the amount of $53,534,679.”
UMC Electronics Co. v. United States (1999)
“On August 28, 1995, the United States moved for leave to file counterclaims under the Special Plea in Fraud, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (1994), the False Claims Act, 31 U.”
O'Brien Gear & Machine Co. v. United States (1979)
“Accordingly, the court concludes and specifically finds that defendant’s special plea in fraud is sustained and plaintiffs claim is adjudged forfeited to the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514 . The petition is dismissed and judgment of forfeiture is entered on…”
Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United States (2015)
“§ 3729 (2012), as well as an affirmative defense 65 under the Special Plea in Fraud statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (2012) and the anti-fraud provision of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.”
Veridyne Corp. v. United States (2012)
“Defendant filed its answer on July 31, 2006, asserting fraud as a defense and counterclaiming for forfeiture under 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (2006). Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment in No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.