28 U.S.C. § 2519
Conclusiveness of judgment
A final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims against any plaintiff shall forever bar any further claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the matters involved in the case or controversy.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: PCL Constr. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 84 Fed. Cl. 408 (Fed. Cl. 2008).
PCL Constr. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 84 Fed. Cl. 408 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “28 U.S.C. § 2519 (“Conclusiveness of Judgment”) The government adds that PCL’s present claims are barred by 28 U.”
United States v. Dann, 470 U.S. 39 (1985). “” 10 On the finality of judgments of the Court of Claims, see 28 U. S. C. §2519 (1976 ed.) (“A final judgment of the Court of Claims against any plaintiff shall forever bar any further claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the matters involved in the…”
CW Gov't Travel, Inc. v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 554 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “Congress allows this court to enter final judgments under 28 U.S.C. § 2519 (1994), which states: “A final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims against any plaintiff shall forever bar any further claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the…”
Coastal Env't Grp., Inc. v. United States, 114 Fed. Cl. 124 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “28 U.S.C. § 2519 (using the phrase "case or controversy” in describing the finality of judgments of the Court of Federal Claims).”
Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “554, 557-58 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2519 (2000) (empowering the Court of Federal Claims to enter final judgments in any "claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the matters involved in the case or controversy”).”
Wolfchild v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 22 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “See 28 U.S.C. § 2519 ("A final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims against any plaintiff shall forever bar any further claim, suit, or demand against the United States arising out of the matters involved in the case or controversy.”
Brookfield Relocation Inc. v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “28 U.S.C. § 2519 . In short, “[although this [cjourt is not an Article III court, the ‘case or controversy’ requirement of Article III is still applicable.”
Kennedy v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 309 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “28 U.S.C. § 2519 (using the phrase "case or controversy” in describing the finality of judgments of the Court of Federal Claims).”
Emerald Int'l Corp. v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 674 (Fed. Cl. 2002). “Second, the statute empowering this court to enter final judgments specifically refers to "case or controversy,” 28 U.S.C. § 2519 , thereby appearing to invoke the Article III requirements.”
Smith v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 374 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “12 C.F.R. § 552.13 (h) (2003); N.C. GEN. STAT.”
Cook v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 277 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “28 U.S.C. § 2519 (using the phrase "case or controversy" in describing the finality of judgments of the Court of Federal Claims).”
Ernest F. Boruski, Jr. v. United States Gov't, 493 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1974). “Therefore, under § 2517(b) and the general res judicata principles applied to the Court of Claims in 28 U.S.C. § 2519 , appellant cannot be awarded further back pay.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.