28 U.S.C. § 252
Tenure and salaries of judges
Judges of the Court of International Trade shall hold office during good behavior. Each shall receive a salary at an annual rate determined under section 225 of the Federal Salary Act of 1967 (2 U.S.C. 351–361), as adjusted by section 461 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1949–2005 · leading case: United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980).
United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980). “§ 213 (Court of Customs and Patent Appeals); 28 U. S. C. § 252 (Court of International Trade (formerly Customs Court)).”
E. States Petroleum Corp. v. William P. Rogers, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 280 F.2d 611 (D.C. Cir. 1960). “Judges of the Customs Court receive the same salary as district judges, compare 28 U.S.C. § 252 (1958) with 28 U.S.C. § 135 (1958); judges of the Court *615 of Customs and Patent Appeals receive the same salary as circuit judges, compare 28 U.”
Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharm., Inc., 390 F. Supp. 2d 952 (C.D. Cal. 2005). “See 28 U.S.C. § 252 . Likewise, Aventis and Defendants agree that the inequitable conduct in the prosecution of the ’618 patent invalidates the ’743 reissue patent.”
BellSouth Telecomm. v. MCImetro Access, 278 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2002). “See 28 U.S.C. § 252 (e). There are only two available grounds for rejecting the agreement.”
BellSouth Telecomm., Inc. v. MCImetro Access Transmission Servs., Inc., 317 F.3d 1270 (Mont. 2003). “See 28 U.S.C. § 252 (e). There are only two available grounds for rejecting the agreement.”
Kjar v. United States, 177 F.2d 630 (5th Cir. 1949). “11 overpaid taxes, instead of against Kjar, and that the judgment recorded in the District Court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 252 , (before the revision of Title 28 1 ), is plainly wrong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.