2 U.S.C. § 351
Establishment
There is hereby established a commission to be known as the Citizens’ Commission on Public Service and Compensation (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1976–1987 · leading case: Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).
Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). “2d 1028 (1977) (upholding legislative veto provision in Federal Salary Act, 2 U. S. C. § 351 et seq. ), cert. denied, 434 U.”
Atkins v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 186 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “Pursuant to the so-called Federal Salary Act of 1967, 2 U.S.C. §§ 351 et seq. (1970) (hereinafter the Salary Act or the Act), the Commission on Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Salaries (the Commission) recommended in 1973 that the salaries of federal judges be increased by…”
Pressler v. Simon, 428 F. Supp. 302 (D.D.C. 1976). “This action seeks a judgment declaring that those sections of the Postal Revenue and Salary Act of 1967, 2 U.S.C. §§ 351 et seq. (“Salary Act”) and the Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 1975,' 2 U.”
Will v. United States, 478 F. Supp. 621 (N.D. Ill. 1979). “2 U.S.C. § 351 . 3 . The Federal Pay Comparability Act provides a mechanism under which the vast majority of federal employees have received each year since 1970, a pay adjustment approximating the rise in the cost-of-living in the private sector.”
Humphrey v. Baker, 665 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 1987). “s action was brought by one Senator, five Congressmen, an organization of taxpayers, and two individual taxpayers against several officers of the Legislative and Executive Branches to prevent them from disbursing to Senators, Congressmen, judicial officers, and certain officials…”
Fong v. Beggs, 620 F. Supp. 847 (D.D.C. 1985). “At that time, the Federal Salary Act, 2 U.S.C. § 351 , et seq., increased the ceiling in the General Schedule (GS-18) from $39,-600 to $47,500.”
Ruth v. Cong. of United States, 71 F.R.D. 676 (D.N.J. 1976). “5 years consecutive to sentence of 6/7/74; Count 2, 5 years consecutive to count 1, execution of term sentence suspended and 5 years probation to follow completion of count 1.”
Legal Effect of Jt. Resolution Disapproving the President's Pay Recommendations (OLC 1987). “102 effectively “disapproved” the recent pay recommendations made by the Presi dent pursuant to the Federal Salary Act of 1967, 2 U.S.C. §§ 351 et seq. We believe § 3 has no legal force, because H.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.