U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART I— ORGANIZATION OF COURTS › Chapter CHAPTER 11— COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

28 U.S.C. § 257

Publication of decisions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

All decisions of the Court of International Trade shall be preserved and open to inspection. The court shall forward copies of each decision to the Secretary of the Treasury or his designee and to the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the case arose. The Secretary shall publish weekly such decisions as he or the court may designate and abstracts of all other decisions.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1941–2025 · leading case: Adams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Adams)
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Adams) (1989) paeb “28 U.S.C. §§ 257 , 1334. See, Pacor, Inc.”
National Corn Growers Ass'n v. Baker (1986) cit “28 U.S.C. § 257 (1982). The published opinions of this Court were intended to serve as valuable guides to the rights and obligations of the international trade community.”
ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States (1979) cusc “One cannot draw any inference from 28 U.S.C. § 257 with respect to 19 U.S.C.”
Loveridge v. Hall (In re Renewable Energy Development Corp.) (2013) utd “Notwithstanding this provision, parties may consent to allow a bankruptcy judge to enter final judgments on non-core proceedings if they wish. See 28 U.S.C. § 157 (c)(2). Bankruptcy judges have the authority to determine “whether a proceeding is a core proceeding .”
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States (1948) cc “Section 151 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S. C.A. § 257, in addition to requiring the court to investigate and determine the facts in the case and report the same to the referring House of Congress together with such conclusions as shall be sufficient to inform Congress of the…”
McQuown v. United States (1972) cc “” Recommendations that the bar of limitations be waived and claimant excused for his delay in bringing suit have been made, under former 28 U.S.C. § 257 (1940) by the court and present § 2509(c) by the commissioners, only where good cause appeared.”
United States v. Rodiek (1941) ca2 “There followed a congressional reference to the Court of Claims, 28 U.S. C.A. § 257, and a proceeding therein, which is still pending, for an advisory report.”
Ross Packing Co. v. United States (1942) waed “Claimant contended that the later contract was secured by duress or coercion. It alleged such duress consisted of a threat to break the first contract.”
Braun v. United States (1942) cc “Section 151 of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 257 , under which the petition in this case was filed, pursuant to Senate Resolution 270 of June 7, 1938 (finding 13), provides, among other things, for a report by the court to the Senate of the facts in the case and the amount,…”
California Steel Indus., Inc. v. United States (2024) cit “” 28 U.S.C. § 257 ; cf. In re Application of Leopold to Unseal Certain Elec.”
Indigo Dreams, LLC v. Gasser (2025) mdb “The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has referred the bankruptcy case and this adversary proceeding to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 257 (a) and its Local Rule 402.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.