28 U.S.C. § 2644
Interest
If, in a civil action in the Court of International Trade under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the plaintiff obtains monetary relief by a judgment or under a stipulation agreement, interest shall be allowed at an annual rate established under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Such interest shall be calculated from the date of the filing of the summons in such action to the date of the refund.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: International Business MacHines Corporation v. United States
International Business MacHines Corporation v. United States (2000)
“Two provisions, 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1505 (c), were raised before the Court of International Trade and by amici on appeal.”
United States Shoe Corporation v. United States (2002)
“§ 2411, nor customs related statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1505 , permitted the award.”
United States v. Goodman (1983)
“5 Further, it appears equitable that prejudgment interest should be calculated on the basis of the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (in accordance with 26 U.”
Kalan, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant (1991)
“at 456 ; see 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (1988). * But the court interpreted 19 U.”
Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. United States (1997)
“In doing so, Customs provided interest, based on 28 U.S.C. § 2644 , from the date Baxter filed the summons for each entry to the date of refund.”
United States v. Atkinson (1983)
“Plaintiff has requested in his motion for summary judgment pre- as well as post judgment interest in accordance with the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 . As the government correctly acknowledges, the provisions in 19 U.”
United States v. $7,990.00 in U.S. Currency, George James Fiorentino, Claimant/appellant (1999)
“§ 2411 (overpayments of federal tax), and 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (refunds of excess customs duties).”
United States v. International Trading Services, LLC (2017)
“14 Prejudgment interest shall be computed at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
United States v. Servitex, Inc. (1982)
“2 *696 Although 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1677g mandate interest in certain instances, said sections are specifically directed toward well-defined actions and, as such, are not applicable to section 592 actions herein.”
American Motorists Ins. Co. v. United States (1998)
“§ 1581 (a)], the plaintiff obtains monetary relief by a judgment or under a stipulation agreement, interest shall be allowed at an annual rate established under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.”
United States v. Deladiep, Inc. (2017)
“27 The pre-judgment interest shall be computed at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
United States v. Horizon Products International, Inc. (2015)
“, 26 CIT 1224 , 1240, 2002 WL 31357050 (2002), at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.