U.S. Code » Title 28 » Part PART VI— PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS › Chapter CHAPTER 169— COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE PROCEDURE

28 U.S.C. § 2644

Interest

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

If, in a civil action in the Court of International Trade under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the plaintiff obtains monetary relief by a judgment or under a stipulation agreement, interest shall be allowed at an annual rate established under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Such interest shall be calculated from the date of the filing of the summons in such action to the date of the refund.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp. v. United States, 201 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp. v. United States, 201 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2000). · cites it 3× “Two provisions, 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1505 (c), were raised before the Court of International Trade and by amici on appeal.”
United States Shoe Corp. v. United States, 296 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “§ 2411, nor customs related statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1505 , permitted the award.”
United States v. Goodman, 572 F. Supp. 1284 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). · cites it 3× “5 Further, it appears equitable that prejudgment interest should be calculated on the basis of the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (in accordance with 26 U.”
Kalan, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 944 F.2d 847 (Fed. Cir. 1991). · cites it 3× “at 456 ; see 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (1988). * But the court interpreted 19 U.”
Travenol Labs., Inc. v. United States, 118 F.3d 749 (Fed. Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “In doing so, Customs provided interest, based on 28 U.S.C. § 2644 , from the date Baxter filed the summons for each entry to the date of refund.”
United States v. Atkinson, 575 F. Supp. 791 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff has requested in his motion for summary judgment pre- as well as post judgment interest in accordance with the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 . As the government correctly acknowledges, the provisions in 19 U.”
United States v. $7,990.00 in U.S. Currency, George James Fiorentino, Claimant/appellant, 170 F.3d 843 (8th Cir. 1999). “§ 2411 (overpayments of federal tax), and 28 U.S.C. § 2644 (refunds of excess customs duties).”
United States v. Int'l Trading Servs., LLC, 2017 CIT 55 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “14 Prejudgment interest shall be computed at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
United States v. Servitex, Inc., 535 F. Supp. 695 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1982). · cites it 2× “2 *696 Although 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and 19 U.S.C. § 1677g mandate interest in certain instances, said sections are specifically directed toward well-defined actions and, as such, are not applicable to section 592 actions herein.”
Am. Motorists Ins. Co. v. United States, 8 F. Supp. 2d 874 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1998). · cites it 5× “§ 1581 (a)], the plaintiff obtains monetary relief by a judgment or under a stipulation agreement, interest shall be allowed at an annual rate established under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.”
United States v. Deladiep, Inc., 2017 CIT 108 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “27 The pre-judgment interest shall be computed at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
United States v. Horizon Prods. Int'l, Inc., 2015 CIT 80 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015). “, 26 CIT 1224 , 1240, 2002 WL 31357050 (2002), at the rate provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2644 and in accordance with 26 U.”
Show all 64 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.