28 U.S.C. § 3

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 28 CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of this Act, the term—“(1) ‘agency’ means an Executive agency as defined under section 105 of title 5, United States Code, and includes the United States Postal Service;“(2) ‘civil monetary penalty’ means any penalty, fine, or other sanction that—“(A)(i) is for a specific monetary amount as provided by Federal law; or“(ii) has a maximum amount provided for by Federal law; and“(B) is assessed or enforced by an agency pursuant to Federal law; and“(C) is assessed or enforced pursuant to an administrative proceeding or a civil action in the Federal courts; and“(3) ‘Consumer Price Index’ means the Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers published by the Department of Labor.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2024 · leading case: Healthcare Real Estate Partner v.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Healthcare Real Estate Partner v. (2019) ca3 “See 28 U.S.C. §§ 3 In the motion to dismiss filed with the bankruptcy court, appellees did not specify what federal rule they were moving under, nor did the bankruptcy court articulate which rule formed the basis of its dismissal order.”

United States Ex Rel. Doe v. DeGregorio (2007) flmd “” See 28 U.S.C. § 3 101(b)(1)(B), (b)(1)(c) (emphasis added).”

Transouth Financial Corp. v. Bell (1997) almd “Authority to issue a stay of judicial proceedings pending arbitration is found in § 3 of the act, which states that, “If any suit or proceeding be brought' in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration .”

Andre Patterson v. G. Cortez (2019) cacd “27 In accordance with the mandate of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), the 28 Court has screened the Complaint prior to ordering service for the purpose of determining whether 1 the action is frivolous or malicious; or fails to state a claim upon which relief…”

Lamb v. Smith and Wamsley PLLC (2024) azd “Indeed, 28 U.S.C. § 3 1332 "requires complete diversity – no plaintiff may be a citizen of the same state as any 4 defendant.”

Joshua Grunwald v. Patrick Covello (2019) cacd “§ 2244 (d)(1)(B) nor 28 U.S.C. § 3 2244(d)(1)(C) apply. However, in light of his reliance on the Supreme Court’s 4 decision in Descamps v.”

Flemming v. Kernan (2019) cand “27 28 1 ANALYSIS 2 The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 3 2254, applies to this action.”

Christian Erickson v. Holcim US, Inc. (2024) cacd “” 28 U.S.C. § 3 1447(c); see Kelton Arms Condo.”

Natl Parks v. TVA (2007) ca6 “” 28 U.S.C. §3 2462. The CAA provides for civil penalties of $25,000 per day per violation, 42 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.