5 U.S.C. § 105
Notwithstanding section 6106 of title 5, United States Code, the Commission or an agency may use recording clocks as part of its experiments under this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 120
cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Peggy Maloney v. Exec. Off. of the President, Off. of Admin., 2022 MSPB 26 (MSPB 2022).
Peggy Maloney v. Exec. Off. of the President, Off. of Admin., 2022 MSPB 26 (MSPB 2022). “Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) and the Board have generally relied on 5 U.S.C. § 105 . See, e.g., Booker v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 982 F.”
Pellegrino v. U.S. Transp. SEC. Admin., 896 F.3d 207 (3rd Cir. 2018). “6 “Executive agency,” defined in 5 U.S.C. § 105 , “means an Executive department, a Government corporation, and an independent establishment.”
Vassallo v. Dep't of Def., 797 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “” 5 U.S.C. § 105 . An executive department includes, among others, the DOD.”
Jephunneh Lawrence v. Elmer B. Staats, 640 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “The term “executive agency” in 5 U.S.C. § 105 is defined: Executive Agency For purposes of this Title, “Executive Agency” means an Executive department, a government Corporation, an independent establishment.”
In Re Aiken Cnty., 645 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “Given the importance and bitterness of the underlying dispute over Yucca Mountain, I think it *439 worth exploring how we got here, constitutionally speaking.”
John Miller, Jr. v. Hillary Clinton, 687 F.3d 1332 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “Accordingly, it is undisputed that, as a general matter, the protections of § 633a extend extraterritorially to cover United States citizens employed by federal agencies abroad.”
PHH Corp. v. Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau, 881 F.3d 75 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “” All that really means, however, is that the agency is an arm of the federal government: for the purpose of 5 U.S.C. § 105 , an “Executive agency” includes not only “an Executive department” but also “a Government corporation” and “an independent establishment.”
John Doe v. United States, 853 F.3d 792 (5th Cir. 2017). “§ 101 , and an “Executive department” is included as an “Executive agency” in 5 U.S.C. § 105 . It therefore appears that the DOJ may be an agency with regard to certain acts or failures to act, though 5 U.”
Minnie M. Honeycutt v. John E. Long, Major Gen. Commander, Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 861 F.2d 1346 (5th Cir. 1988). “§ 102 , and in executive agencies as defined by 5 U.S. C. § 105. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a) and 29 U.”
James Reynolds v. Daniel M. Tangherlini, 737 F.3d 1093 (7th Cir. 2013). “§ 633a(a); 5 U.S.C. § 105 (defining “executive agencies”).”
Elgin v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, 641 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2011). “" 5 U.S.C. § 105 . [2] See 5 U.S.C. §§ 7511-7514 , 7701-7703; 5 C.”
Tiberio v. Allergy Asthma Immunology of Rochester, 664 F.3d 35 (2d Cir. 2011). “§ 102 ; (2) Executive agencies as defined in 5 U.S.C. § 105 ; (3) The United States Postal Service, Postal Rate Commission and Tennessee Valley Authority; (4) All units of the judicial branch of the Federal government having positions in the competitive service, except for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.