28 U.S.C. § 3204
Installment payment order
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: In Re Bartle
In Re Bartle (2009)
“§ 3204 establishing an installment plan pursuant to which Bartle would satisfy that judgment, the parties consented to an order obligating him both to make regular payments toward his debt and to submit sworn reports as to the amounts and sources of his income. Three years into…”
United States v. Runnells (2004)
“In particular, the court will consider whether to order defendants to make installment payments pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3204 , which statute allows such *727 an order upon a showing that the debtor “(1) is receiving or will receive substantial nonexempt disposable earnings from…”
United States v. Chorney (2011)
“As it happens, defendant is in a position to seek a modification of the installment order, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 3204 (b), due to a change in his financial circumstances (stemming from his recent move out of his girlfriend’s home).”
Schueler v. Rayjas Enterprises, Inc. (1994)
“Section 3305 [see 28 USC § 3204 ]. Installment payment order This section provides that upon motion of the United States where a judgment debtor is receiving or will receive money from any source or is attempting to avoid an obligation on the judgment debt by rendering services…”
United States v. Asare (2022)
“However, the Government has not stated that it has served a notice of the memorandum containing its motion for an installment payment order on Judgment Debtors “in the same manner as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested” as required by 28 U.S.C.…”
S. Davis, Sr. v. United States (2014)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 3204 (a). But “[a]n order may not be issued under subsection (a) with respect to any earnings of the debtor except nonexempt disposable earnings.”
S. Davis, Sr. v. United States (2012)
“The government subsequently moved in the district court for installment-payment orders against the counter-defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3204 . Only Davis opposed that motion, and he twice moved for oral argument to present evidence of his inability to pay the amounts…”
United States v. Whittington (2005)
“28 U.S.C. § 3204 . At the hearing held in this matter, the government produced *633 overwhelming evidence in support of its contention that defendant, in 2001 and 2002, engaged in a pattern of diverting and concealing monies through WDC.”
John Bartle v. United States (2009)
“§ 3204 establishing an installment plan pursuant to which Bartle would satisfy that judg- ment, the parties consented to an order obligating him both to make regular payments toward his debt and to submit sworn reports as to the amounts and sources of his income.”
United States v. Mark Miles (2009)
“” 28 U.S.C. § 3204 (a)(1) & (2). The district court held an evidentiary hearing at which Miles, his accountant, and a fraud examiner from the Internal Revenue Service testified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.