Notes of Decisions
United States v. St. Regis Paper Co., 355 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1966).
· cites it 3× “Our conclusion that Sections 16 and 5(1) were intended to be mutually inter-dependent disposes of the Government’s attempt to invoke the plenary authority of the Attorney General to prosecute all civil actions in which the United States is interested, 28 U.S.C. § 507 (a) (2),…”
United States v. Zucca, 351 U.S. 91 (1956).
· cites it 2× “[9] 28 U. S. C. § 507 (a) (2). [10] Letter of Attorney General Bonaparte, March 26, 1907 (unpublished, National Archives), cited in a contemporary treatise by a recognized authority on the statute.”
Waldemar P. Thomson v. The United States, 357 F.2d 683 (Ct. Cl. 1966).
· cites it 3× “First, the United States Attorney was authorized to deal with plaintiff, not merely to act as an automatic conduit for Washington.”
Alex Carl Smith v. United States, 375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1967).
“, 28 U.S.C.A. § 507 . The discretion of the Attorney General in choosing whether to prosecute or not to prosecute, or to abandon a prosecution already started, is absolute.”
Arra Ray Messenger v. United States, 231 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1956).
“§ 309 and 28 U.S.C.A. § 507 , whereby the Attorney General or any officer of the Department of Justice was empowered to “conduct and argue any case in which the government is interested, in any court of the United States * * *,” 16 Stat.”
Louis R. Hutcherson v. United States, 345 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1965).
“” 28 U.S.C. § 507 (b). We are not advised, however, of the extent to which these instructions are followed, 23 and of the extent to which the narcotics squad of the Metropolitan Police Department influences the choice.”
United States v. Zucca, 125 F. Supp. 551 (S.D.N.Y. 1954).
· cites it 2× “The Government contends that the source of a United States Attorney’s *553 power to institute civil denaturalization actions is the “duty of each United States attorney, within his district, to * * * prosecute * * * for the government, all civil actions, suits or proceedings in…”
Larsen v. Hoffman, 444 F. Supp. 245 (D.D.C. 1977).
“76-0610, were selected for promotion by the Reconstituted Boards, with entitlement to back pay, allowances, and credit for time served. On October 8, 1976, we dismissed as to defendant Porche.”
Pugach v. Klein, 193 F. Supp. 630 (S.D.N.Y. 1961).
“28 U.S.C.A. § 507 . In exercising his power, the United States Attorney acts in an administrative capacity as the representative of the public.”
John Smith, Jr. v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, 351 F.2d 810 (D.C. Cir. 1965).
“Restraining the Attorney General from enforcing the criminal laws, a duty with which he is expressly charged, see 28 U.S.C. § 507 , is said to be a manifest interference with public administration, cf.”
Huckshold v. HSSL, LLC, 344 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (E.D. Mo. 2004).
“[2] See 28 U.S.C. § 507 (b) (providing for a three-year statute of limitations for civil actions maintained under the Copyright Act).”
— 28 U.S.C. § 507(a) — 2 cases
United States v. St. Regis Paper Co., 355 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1966).
“Our conclusion that Sections 16 and 5(1) were intended to be mutually inter-dependent disposes of the Government’s attempt to invoke the plenary authority of the Attorney General to prosecute all civil actions in which the United States is interested, 28 U.S.C. § 507 (a) (2),…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.