Notes of Decisions
Johnson v. Gov't of the Dist. of Columbia, 734 F.3d 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
· cites it 11× “4181 , 4512–15 (1988) (codified at 28 U.S.C. §§ 561–569), two United States Marshals serve the District of Columbia.”
Johnson v. Gov't of the Dist. of Columbia, 584 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2008).
· cites it 8× “(codified at 28 U.S.C. § 561 (a)). At the same time, Congress created the totally-new position of the Superior Court Marshal.”
Richardson v. Johnson, 598 F.3d 734 (11th Cir. 2010).
“Because the Marshals Service is part of the Department of Justice, 28 U.S.C. § 561 , it should have ready access to the necessary information.”
Logsdon v. United States Marshal Serv., 91 F.4th 1352 (10th Cir. 2024).
“Moreover, the USMS is a bureau within the Department of Justice (DOJ), see 28 U.S.C. § 561 (a), and the DOJ Inspector General “may investigate allegations of criminal wrongdoing or administrative misconduct by an employee of the Department of Justice,” 5 U.”
Lyles v. Hughes, 83 F. Supp. 3d 315 (D.D.C. 2015).
· cites it 3× “The USMS is a bureau within the United States Department of Justice, see 28 U.S.C. § 561 (a), and the United States Marshal for the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate, id.”
W. Foster Sellers v. United States of Am., 902 F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1990).
“Because the Marshals Service is part of the Department of Justice, 28 U.S.C. § 561 , it should have ready access to the necessary information.”
United States v. J.C. Herbert Bryant, Jr., 117 F.3d 1464 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
· cites it 3× “” 28 U.S.C. § 561 (f). 1 He has no statutory authority to appoint anyone other than a Marshals Service employee or official as an “officer” of any kind.”
Chabal v. Reagan, 822 F.2d 349 (3d Cir. 1987).
· cites it 4× “Facts In 1982, Chabal was appointed to a four-year term as the marshal for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 561 . 1 On October 4,1985, prior to the expiration of his term, Chabal received a letter from defendant Robert Tuttle, Deputy Assistant to the…”
28 U.S.C. § 561(b): 1 case
28 U.S.C. § 561(f): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.