28 U.S.C. § 562
Vacancies
A prior section 562, added Pub. L. 89–554, § 4(c),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1967–2008 · leading case: Paul v. Connolly v. United States Department of Justice
Paul v. Connolly v. United States Department of Justice (1985)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 562 (1982). On appeal, and after a hearing at which Connolly did not testify or produce witnesses in his behalf, the presiding official found that Connolly had probable cause for arresting Raymond Gonsalves and Daniel Pa *510 checo.”
United States v. Baldwin (2008)
“See 28 U.S.C. § 562 . 4. How Judicial Appointment Often Works.”
Thompson v. Link (1974)
“In 1966, the deputy marshals were placed in the classified Civil Service, 28 U.S.C. § 562 . In 1971, the maximum-age limit was abolished.”
Authority of the Attorney General to Make Successive Designations of Interim United States Marshals (1993)
“Authority of the Attorney General to Make Successive Designations of Interim United States Marshals Under 28 U S.C. § 562, the A ttorney General may make two or m ore successive designations o f a person to serve as interim United States m arshal in a judicial district where the…”
Department of Labor Jurisdiction to Investigate Certain Criminal Matters (1986)
“See also 28 U S.C. §§ 562, 569(c), 28 C.F.R . § 0 .”
Carriage of Firearms by the Marshal, Deputy Marshals, and Judges of the Customs Court (1967)
“§ 561 and the Deputies appointed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 562 . These are the officers ordinarily referred to as United States Marshals and Deputies.”
— 28 U.S.C. § 562(b)(2) — 1 case
Authority of the Attorney General to Make Successive Designations of Interim United States Marshals (1993)
“Authority of the Attorney General to Make Successive Designations of Interim United States Marshals Under 28 U S.C. § 562, the A ttorney General may make two or m ore successive designations o f a person to serve as interim United States m arshal in a judicial district where the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.