28 U.S.C. § 626
Compensation of the Director and Deputy Director
The compensation of the Director of the Federal Judicial Center shall be the same as that of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, and his appointment and salary shall not be subject to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in competitive service, or the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of such title, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates: Provided, however, That any Director who is a justice or judge of the United States in active or retired status shall serve without additional compensation. The compensation of the Deputy Director of the Federal Judicial Center shall be the same as that of the Deputy Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 110
cases (63 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: LaFleur v. Teen Help
LaFleur v. Teen Help (2003)
“2 The Goold and Dou-binin cases were assigned to magistrate judges for pretrial proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1). Each case ultimately was dismissed.”
Dafeng Hengwei Textile Co. v. Aceco Industrial & Commercial Corp. (2014)
“Plaintiffs Objections Plaintiff objects to Judge Pohorelsky’s recommendation that the Court grant Rockaway’s motion to vacate the Attachment Order, arguing that Judge Pohorel-sky made three errors: (1) failing to find that Aceco has a “legal and equitable” interest in the…”
Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Balt. Cnty. (2018)
“The County argues that the district court properly exercised its discretion under the ADEA, 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b), in denying the EEOC an award of back pay.”
Burley v. Miller (2017)
“#7] to ready the matter for trial, and to conduct a trial if the parties consent under 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1)(c). It is further ORDERED that the magistrate judge refer the ease to the Court’s pro bono administrator for appointment of pro bono counsel for the plaintiff.”
Miller v. Gray (2014)
“28 U.S.C. § 626 (e).”) (internal quotations omitted).”
Charles v. County of Nassau (2015)
“Unopposed recommendations The Court has reviewed the unopposed portions of the R & R, and, finding no clear error, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1), the Court adopts Judge Brown’s recommendations that the Court (1) dismiss as withdrawn Plaintiffs claims of defamation and…”
Trevino v. Kelly (2017)
“# 25] to ready the matter for trial, and to conduct a trial if the parties consent under 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1)(c).”
McGillivray v. Life Ins. Co. of North America (2007)
“26) is ADOPTED and INCORPORATED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1)(C). 2. The plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Record (Docket No.”
Murphy v. Lockhart (2011)
“Michelson under the previous reference order to ready the matter for trial, and to conduct a trial if the parties consent under 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1)(c). ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CORRECT AND CLARIFY THE COURT’S SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 OPINION…”
Boyle v. City of Philadelphia (2016)
“” 15 Similarly, “[a] party seeking relief under the ADEA must exhaust his or her administrative remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 626 (d).” 16 This requires that the charge be timely filed and that the claims asserted in the litigation fall within the scope of the charge filed…”
Silver v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2006)
“However, we remanded the matter back to the District *87 Court after construing Silver’s notice of appeal as an appeal to the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626 (b)(1)(A). See Silver v. Am.”
Jenkins v. Akzo Noble Coatings, Inc. (2002)
“2 On September 5, 2001, after conducting a de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 626 (b)(1) (West 1999), the district court issued a “memorandum and order” granting summary judgment in Akzo’s favor as to the contract and fraud claims.”
— 28 U.S.C. § 626(b)(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.