29 U.S.C. § 1145
Delinquent contributions
Every employer who is obligated to make contributions to a multiemployer plan under the terms of the plan or under the terms of a collectively bargained agreement shall, to the extent not inconsistent with law, make such contributions in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plan or such agreement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,215
cases (430 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Bd. of Trs. v. Four-C-Aire, Inc., 929 F.3d 135 (4th Cir. 2019).
Bd. of Trs. v. Four-C-Aire, Inc., 929 F.3d 135 (4th Cir. 2019). “, a former participating employer, pursuant to § 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1145 . After the district court granted Four-C-Aire's motion to dismiss, the Fund appealed.”
United Auto. Workers Local 259 Soc. Sec. Dep't v. Metro Auto Ctr., 501 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2007). “On May 7, 2003, the Fund filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey pursuant to ERISA § 515, 29 U.S.C. § 1145 , seeking unpaid contributions totaling $1,928.”
Finkel v. Romanowicz, 577 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2009). “In March 2006, the Joint Board filed suit against Whiffen and Ramonowicz, alleging that, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1145 , each had failed to remit timely contributions to the 401(k) Plan and other ERISA plans administered by the Joint Board.”
Carpenters S. California Admin. Corp. v. El Capitan Dev. Co., 811 P.2d 296 (Cal. 1991). “) Additionally, section 515 of ERISA ( 29 U.S.C. § 1145 ) provides: "Delinquent Contributors.”
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 2 v. Moulton Masonry & Constr., LLC, 779 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2015). “Under Section 515 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1145 , any “employ *188 er who is obligated to make contributions to a multiemployer plan under the terms of the plan or under the terms of a collectively bargained agreement shall, to the extent not inconsistent with law, make such…”
Fishbein v. Miranda, 670 F. Supp. 2d 264 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). “) On November 15, 2006, Plaintiffs filed the instant action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of sections 515, 404(a), 409(a), and 406(b)(2) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1145 , 1104(a), 1109(a), and 1106(b)(2), violations of…”
Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Constr. Co., 783 F.3d 1045 (6th Cir. 2015). “The Funds moved to strike the affirmative defenses, arguing that § 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1145 , bars equitable defenses.”
Teamsters & Employers Welfare Trust of Illinois v. Gorman Bros. Ready Mix, 283 F.3d 877 (7th Cir. 2002). “29 U.S.C. § 1145 . After a bench trial, the district judge held the suit barred by the doctrine of laches and so entered judgment for the company.”
Gesualdi v. Reid, 198 F. Supp. 3d 211 (E.D.N.Y 2016). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 9, 2014, plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint, alleging claims under Section 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1145 , and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947…”
Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 32 BJ v. ShamrockClean, Inc., 325 F. Supp. 3d 631 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “29 U.S.C. § 1145 . Under ERISA, an employer's failure to make withdrawal liability payments pursuant to Section 1401 is treated as a delinquent contribution in accordance with Section 1145.”
Litton Fin. Printing Div., Litton Bus. Sys., Inc. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190 (1991). “" 29 U. S. C. § 1145 . Any postexpiration obligation to contribute was imposed by the NLRA, not by the bargaining agreement, and so the District Court lacked jurisdiction under § 502(g)(2) of ERISA, 29 U.”
John H. Held v. Mfrs. Hanover Leasing Corp., 912 F.2d 1197 (10th Cir. 1990). “as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C. § 1145 .” Id. (citation omitted).”
— 29 U.S.C. § 1145(b) — 1 case
Steelworkers Pension Trust v. The Renco Grp., Inc. (W.D. Pa. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.