29 U.S.C. § 1149
Prohibition on false statements and representations
This chapter, referred to in par. (4), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 93–406, known as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Titles I, III, and IV of such Act are classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of this title and Tables.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Daniel Soehnlen v. Fleet Owners Ins. Fund, 844 F.3d 576 (6th Cir. 2016).
Daniel Soehnlen v. Fleet Owners Ins. Fund, 844 F.3d 576 (6th Cir. 2016). “Count V: Breach of § 1149 In Count V of their complaint, Plaintiffs argue pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1149 that Defendants Robert Kavalec, Victor Collo-va, and Charlie Alferio made false statements and false representations of fact, knowing these representations to be false in…”
In Re United States Sugar, Corp. Litig., 669 F. Supp. 2d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2009). “White, and Robert Bunker, pursuant to ERISA § 510, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1149 and 1132(a)(3). All defendants filed motions to dismiss all the counts alleged against them.”
United States v. Borino (5th Cir. 2024). “§ 7206 (2) (Counts 2–13); making false statements and representations in connection with a multiple employer welfare arrangement, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1149 (Counts 14–18); conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.