29 U.S.C. § 144
Separability
If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1948–2025 · leading case: James Barber v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 383 F.3d 134 (3rd Cir. 2004).
James Barber v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 383 F.3d 134 (3rd Cir. 2004). “” 29 U.S.C. § 144 (b)(2)(A). The Miller test, we believe, demands more than whether a law substantially affects the insurance arrangement between the insurer and insured.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948). “503, Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 144 . We believe it is clear that Congress intended by the enactment of the Labor Management Relations Act that employers be free in the future to discharge supervisors for joining a union, and to interfere with their union…”
Briones v. Bon Secours Health Sys., 69 F. App'x 530 (3rd Cir. 2003). “Appellees removed the case to federal court, arguing that since appellants’ claims required the interpretation of the CBA, § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 144 , et seq., *533 completely preempted their claims and jurisdiction in the federal…”
LeGrand v. Carpenter (D.S.D. 2025). “Under 29 U.S.C. § 144 , a party may seek recusal of a judge by filing a legally sufficient affidavit that demonstrates a personal bias or prejudice of the judge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.