29 U.S.C. § 1591
Repealed. Pub. L. 102–367, title VII, § 702(a)(10), Sept. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1112
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1983–1993 · leading case: City of Newark, New Jersey v. United States Dep't of Labor, 2 F.3d 31 (3rd Cir. 1993).
City of Newark, New Jersey v. United States Dep't of Labor, 2 F.3d 31 (3rd Cir. 1993). “We have jurisdiction to review the Secretary’s final decision pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). II. Under both CETA and the JTPA the Secretary of Labor is empowered to recover funds found to have been improperly spent by grant recipients.”
Tennessee Dep't of Emp. Sec. v. Sec'y of Labor, 801 F.2d 170 (6th Cir. 1986). “While most of CETA was repealed on October 13, *172 1982, 1 the JTPA continued funding of all CETA program activities until September 30, 1983, 29 U.S.C. § 1591 (a). To ensure a smooth transition, § 1591(c)(4) of the JTPA permitted “recipients of financial assistance” under CETA…”
Action, Inc. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor, 789 F.2d 1453 (10th Cir. 1986). “Although CETA has been repealed, jurisdiction is conferred on this court by 29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e), which continues the grant of jurisdiction originally conferred by 29 U.”
Milwaukee Cnty., Wisconsin v. Raymond J. Donovan, Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Labor, 771 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1985). “1355 , 29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e), provides that the new legislation "shall not affect administrative or judicial proceedings pending on [October 13, 1982], or begun between [October 13, 1982,] and September 30, 1984, under [CETA].”
Oakland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. United States Dep't of Labor, 853 F.2d 439 (6th Cir. 1988). “29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). . The auditing and accounting costs incurred in managing a CETA grant are allowable costs.”
Florida Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec. v. United States Dep't of Labor, 893 F.2d 1319 (11th Cir. 1990). “29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). 2 . Pub.L. No. 97-365, 96 Stat.”
City of Chicago, a Mun. Corp., & Police Dep't of the City of Chicago v. United States Dep't of Labor, 737 F.2d 1466 (7th Cir. 1984). “29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). . The record does not indicate that the city disciplined or even counselled Whaley on these occasions or at any other time for his concededly poor attendance itself.”
Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States Dep't of Labor, 723 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1984). “However, under the transitional provision of the Job Training Partnership Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 1591 (e), this court has statutory authority to exercise jurisdiction over proceedings begun between October 13, 1982 and September 30, 1984 under CETA.”
Montgomery Cnty., Maryland v. Dep't of Labor, 757 F.2d 1510 (4th Cir. 1985). “29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). 2 . The record reveals that upon learning that NCECD’s records were unauditable, the County obtained a judgment against NCECD and revised its form contract to include a requirement that subgrantees stipulate to their ability to maintain adequate financial…”
Pierce Cnty. v. United States, by & Through the Dep't of Labor, & Raymond Donovan, Its Sec'y of Labor, Etc., 759 F.2d 1398 (9th Cir. 1985). “The Job Training Partnership Act 29 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1781 , has replaced CETA.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Cabinet for Human Resources v. William Brock, Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Labor, 845 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1988). “See 29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e). . § 676.91.(f), prior to May 9, 1984, provided: Final decision.”
Inland Manpower Ass'n, a California Pub. Entity Exercising Jt. Powers v. United States Dep't of Labor, 882 F.2d 343 (9th Cir. 1989). “29 U.S.C. § 1591 (e) is part of the provision for transition from CETA to JTPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.