29 U.S.C. § 16

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Veterans’ Administration (1) $150,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1984 and 1985, (2) a total of $65,000,000 for fiscal years 1986, and 1987, and (3) $60,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1988 and 1989 for the purpose of making payments to employers under this Act and for the purpose of section 18 of this Act. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this section shall remain available until September 30, 1991.“(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any funds appropriated under subsection (a) for any fiscal year which are obligated for the purpose of making payments under section 8 on behalf of a veteran (including funds so obligated which previously had been obligated for such purpose on behalf of another veteran and were thereafter deobligated) and are later deobligated shall immediately upon deobligation become available to the Administrator for obligation for such purpose. The further obligation of such funds by the Administrator for such purpose shall not be delayed, directly or indirectly, in any manner by any officer or employee in the executive branch.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1943–2019 · leading case: Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc., 209 F. Supp. 3d 179 (D.D.C. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc., 209 F. Supp. 3d 179 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 29 U.S.C. § 16 (b). The pre-2015 DCMWA gives discretion to the court, requiring that it award “an additional amount as liquidated damages” without specifying the amount to award.”

Solis v. A-1 Mortg. Corp., 934 F. Supp. 2d 778 (W.D. Pa. 2013). “The FLSA employs a two-tiered statute of limitations that has evolved over time.”

Rigopoulos v. Kervan, 140 F.2d 506 (2d Cir. 1943). “29 U.S.C.A. § 16 (b); see American Can Co.”

Musmeci v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, 159 F. Supp. 2d 329 (E.D. La. 2001). “By operation of law, the Schwegmann partnership was both the plan sponsor, 29 U.S.C. § 16 (B) (“plan sponsor” means the employer in the case of a plan established by a single employer), and the plan administrator, id.”

H & R Block, Ltd. v. Housden, 24 F. Supp. 2d 703 (E.D. Tex. 1998). “The removing parties assert that this court has original jurisdiction by virtue of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 16 (b) (FLSA), and have petitioned for removal pursuant to 28 U.”

Kujat v. Roundy's Supermarkets Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2019). “MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Scott Kujat and Opt-In Plaintiffs Thomas Cerceo, Anthony Shapiro-Rizzi, and Nathan Farm (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) move for conditional certification and notice of a collective action under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.