29 U.S.C. § 162
Offenses and penalties
Any person who shall willfully resist, prevent, impede, or interfere with any member of the Board or any of its agents or agencies in the performance of duties pursuant to this subchapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1936–2007 · leading case: United States v. Petrillo, 332 U.S. 1 (1947).
United States v. Petrillo, 332 U.S. 1 (1947). “[3] Italics supplied. [1] Emergency Price Control Act, 56 Stat.”
Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952). “151 , 29 U. S. C. § 162 , Interference with a member of the National Labor Relations Board or an agent of the Board in his performance of his duties.”
Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 414 U.S. 168 (1973). “Petitioners argue that the change on October 1, 1964, from driver-salesman to distributor ended their liability to Baker on that date because distributors are “independent contractors” excluded from coverage of the Act by 29 U. S. C. § 162 (3). The Court of Appeals rejected that…”
United States v. Anthony Dilapi & Benjamin Ladmer, 651 F.2d 140 (2d Cir. 1981). “ILGWU Local 102 pleaded nolo conten-dere to one count of impeding the performance of duties of the NLRB in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 162 (1976), and the charges against Gerstein were dismissed.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener, 405 U.S. 117 (1972). “§ 158 (a) (3), and the criminal penalty provided by § 12, 29 U. S. C. § 162 , provide the required protection that justifies a narrow reading of §8 (a) (4).”
Udoh v. Trade Ctr. Mgmt. Assocs., 479 F. Supp. 2d 60 (D.D.C. 2007). “, and age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 162 et seq. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition, the reply, and the entire record in this case, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment…”
Bradley Lumber Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 84 F.2d 97 (5th Cir. 1936). “A bona fide resistance in such matters in order to secure a court test would not in our opinion come within the penal provisions of section 12 of the act ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 162 ) as being a willful impeding, resisting, or interfering with the Board or its agents in the performance…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hardeman Garment Corp., & Lauderdale Garment Corp., 557 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1977). “§ 1505 (1970), or to interfere with the Board’s investigative authority, 29 U.S.C. § 162 (1970). However, as the Board correctly points out, these remedies are inadequate to safeguard the integrity of ongoing unfair labor practice proceedings.”
Associated Press v. Herrick, 13 F. Supp. 897 (S.D.N.Y. 1936). “ing news without interruption twenty-four hours daily, and these employees will be compelled to disclose confidential information pertaining to complainant’s business; that if it should seek to resist or interfere with the board or its agents in the performance of their duties,…”
Pratt v. Stout, 85 F.2d 172 (8th Cir. 1936). “456 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 162 , however, provides that any one who willfully resists, prevents, impedes, or interferes with a member of the board or any of its agents or agencies in the performance of duties pursuant to the act shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or…”
S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Beman, 14 F. Supp. 444 (N.D. Ill. 1936). “The criminal provisions of section 12, 29 U.S.C.A. § 162 , under the well-established rule, may not be given an application beyond the plain language of the statute.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. MacKay Radio & Tel. Co., 87 F.2d 611 (9th Cir. 1937). “It is made a crime, punishable by fine and imprisonment, to interfere with the Board or its agencies in the performance of their duties (section 12 [ 29 U.S.C.A. § 162 ]). It is declared that the act shall not be construed so as to interfere with the right to strike (section 13…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.