29 U.S.C. § 179

Injunctions during national emergency; adjustment efforts by parties during injunction period

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Assistance of Service; acceptance of Service’s proposed settlement

Whenever a district court has issued an order under section 178 of this title enjoining acts or practices which imperil or threaten to imperil the national health or safety, it shall be the duty of the parties to the labor dispute giving rise to such order to make every effort to adjust and settle their differences, with the assistance of the Service created by this chapter. Neither party shall be under any duty to accept, in whole or in part, any proposal of settlement made by the Service.

(b) Reconvening of board of inquiry; report by board; contents; secret ballot of employees by National Labor Relations Board; certification of results to Attorney General

Upon the issuance of such order, the President shall reconvene the board of inquiry which has previously reported with respect to the dispute. At the end of a sixty-day period (unless the dispute has been settled by that time), the board of inquiry shall report to the President the current position of the parties and the efforts which have been made for settlement, and shall include a statement by each party of its position and a statement of the employer’s last offer of settlement. The President shall make such report available to the public. The National Labor Relations Board, within the succeeding fifteen days, shall take a secret ballot of the employees of each employer involved in the dispute on the question of whether they wish to accept the final offer of settlement made by their employer as stated by him and shall certify the results thereof to the Attorney General within five days thereafter.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, § 209, 61 Stat. 155.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1948–1977 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wooster Div. of Borgwarner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 (1958).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wooster Div. of Borgwarner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 (1958). · cites it 2× “156 , 29 U. S. C. § 179 (b), which relates to disputes which imperil national health or safety.”
United States v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, 78 F. Supp. 710 (N.D. Cal. 1948). · cites it 2× “209(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 179 (b), and the Fed *713 eral Mediation and Conciliation Service shall have undertaken the performance of its functions and duties.”
United States v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, 177 F. Supp. 621 (S.D.N.Y. 1959). · cites it 2× “See 29 U.S.C.A. § 179 . While these arguments have much force and I am convinced that the employers’ opposition to the inclusion of such a clause is dictated, at least in part, by their desire to use whatever leverage they derive from their position at the bargaining table, I am…”
United States v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, 116 F. Supp. 262 (S.D.N.Y. 1953). “29 U.S.C.A. § 179 (a). . United States v.”
Employees of Pac. Mar. Ass'n v. Hutt, 562 P.2d 1264 (Wash. 1977). “Pursuant to section 209(b) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 179 (b)), as amended, all employees registered under the ILWU-PMA Pacific Coast Longshore and Clerks' Agreement as class A or class B workers who were employed, ill or on a leave of absence during the…”
Seafarers Int'l Union of North Am. v. United States, 304 F.2d 437 (9th Cir. 1962). · cites it 2× “See 29 U.S.C.A. § 179 (a). 14 It appears to us that their prime preoccupation now should not be with regard to what will happen if the strike is resumed after the eightieth day, but as to how that blow to the national health and safety may be avoided.”
United States v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, 334 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D. Ga. 1971). “” 29 U.S.C.A. § 179 . The purpose and function of the injunction is, of course, to preserve the status quo during the “cooling off” period.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.