The Bureau of Labor Statistics, under the direction of the Secretary of Labor, shall collect, collate, and report at least once each year, or oftener if necessary, full and complete statistics of the conditions of labor and the products and distribution of the products of the same, and to this end said Secretary shall have power to employ any or either of the bureaus provided for his department and to rearrange such statistical work, and to distribute or consolidate the same as may be deemed desirable in the public interests; and said Secretary shall also have authority to call upon other departments of the Government for statistical data and results obtained by them; and said Secretary of Labor may collate, arrange, and publish such statistical information so obtained in such manner as to him may seem wise.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics shall also collect, collate, report, and publish at least once each month full and complete statistics of the volume of and changes in employment, as indicated by the number of persons employed, the total wages paid, and the total hours of employment, in the service of the Federal Government, the States and political subdivisions thereof, and in the following industries and their principal branches: (1) Manufacturing; (2) mining, quarrying, and crude petroleum production; (3) building construction; (4) agriculture and lumbering; (5) transportation, communication, and other public utilities; (6) the retail and wholesale trades; and such other industries as the Secretary of Labor may deem it in the public interest to include. Such statistics shall be reported for all such industries and their principal branches throughout the United States and also by States and/or Federal reserve districts and by such smaller geographical subdivisions as the said Secretary may from time to time prescribe. The said Secretary is authorized to arrange with any Federal, State, or municipal bureau or other governmental agency for the collection of such statistics in such manner as he may deem satisfactory, and may assign special agents of the Department of Labor to any such bureau or agency to assist in such collection.
Notes of Decisions
E. Air Lines, Inc. v. Dept. of Revenue, 455 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1984).
· cites it 2× “The Consumer Price Index referred to in the law is authorized by 29 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 2a and 2b (1976). Under these code provisions, the Secretary of Labor has broad powers to collect, collate and report statistics, and, to that end, has the power to use bureaus provided for the…”
Azcao Carrillo v. Dandan, Inc., 51 F. Supp. 3d 124 (D.D.C. 2014).
“The O’Neil Court cautioned that its decision had “not necessitated a determination of what limitation, if any, [ 29 U.S.C. § 2 ] 16(b) of the [FLSA] places on the validity of agreements between an employer and employee to settle claims arising under the [FLSA] if the settlement…”
Mars Home for Youth v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 666 F.3d 850 (3d Cir. 2011).
“To be entitled to the Act’s protections and includable in a bargaining unit, one must be an “employee” as defined by the Act See 29 U.S.C. §§ 2 (3), 152(3); see also NLRB v.”
Lepore v. Lanvision Sys., Inc., 113 F. App'x 449 (3d Cir. 2004).
“Like the District Court below, we need not address LanVision’s contention that the FMLA is inapplicable under 29 U.S.C. § 2 611 (2) (B) (ii) (FMLA does not cover an employee who is employed at a worksite at which the employer employs less than 50 employees if the total number of…”
Hunt v. State, 252 N.W.2d 715 (Iowa 1977).
“29 U.S.C. § 2 . Numerous federal statutory provisions use the consumer price index either to determine eligibility or calculate the amount of benefits.”
Chao v. Hosp. Staffing Servs. Inc., 270 F.3d 374 (6th Cir. 2001).
“8 The Court agreed that Congress wanted to improve working conditions, but it found additional public policy goals delineated in 29 U.S.C. § 2 (a), which “reflects Congress’ desire to eliminate the competitive advantage enjoyed by goods produced under substandard conditions.”
Thomas v. Grand Lodge of Int'l Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 40 F. Supp. 2d 737 (D. Md. 1999).
“29 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 413. When it became apparent that Land-rum-Griffin would become law, the IAM undertook to comply with § 105 by publishing the entire text of the Act in The Machinist, its weekly publication of that era, sending the publication to all its members.”
Atl. City Elec. Co v. NLRB, 5 F.4th 298 (3d Cir. 2021).
“2011) (citing 29 U.S.C. §§ 2 (3), 152(3)). 5 The Company petitioned for review of the Regional Director’s decision.”
Dixon v. Nat'l Hot Rod Ass'n, 450 F. Supp. 3d 831 (S.D. Ind. 2020).
“§ 1 ; (2) that Defendant mo- nopolized or attempted to monopolize the relevant markets in violation of the Sher- man Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2 ; (3) that Defendant conspired to monopolize the relevant mar- kets in violation of the Sherman Act and the Cartwright Act, Cal.”
Council of Unit Owners of Ellicott Hills Condo. II, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., No. 1:21-cv-02991, 2022 WL 3908555 (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2022).
“2019) (holding the FAA applied to a clause requiring appraisal and out-of-court dispute resolution in a case involving commercial insurance and ‘fire damage),? and that the FAA establishes a “national policy favoring arbitration when the parties contract for that mode of 29…”
Saulsberry v. Savannah River Remediation, LLC, No. 1:16-cv-02792 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2020).
“1995) (finding that, in a case under 29 U.S.C. § 2 (d)(1), injunctive relief was inappropriate because plaintiff was no longer employed by the defendant); see also McCaskill v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.