29 U.S.C. § 208
Repealed. Pub. L. 110–28, title VIII, § 8103(c)(1)(A), May 25, 2007, 121 Stat. 189
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54
cases, 1940–2017 · leading case: S. Garment Mfrs. Ass'n v. Fleming, 122 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1941).
S. Garment Mfrs. Ass'n v. Fleming, 122 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1941). “9 29 U.S.C.A. § 208 (d). 10 7 U.S.C.A. § 228 .”
Manning v. Boston Med. Ctr. Corp., 725 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2013). “” 29 U.S.C. § 208 (d). Courts have generally agreed that “a corporate officer with operational control of a corporation’s covered enterprise is an employer along with the corporation, jointly and severally liable .”
Victor Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc., 735 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2013). “” 29 U.S.C. § 208 (d). In Dancer v. Golden Coin, Ltd.”
Salustio v. 106 Columbia Deli Corp., 264 F. Supp. 3d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “29 U.S.C. § 208 (B)(1)(A). Here, because the $600,000 threshold was not met, there is no “enterprise coverage” and plaintiffs’ claims under the FLSA must be dismissed.”
Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc., 488 F.3d 945 (11th Cir. 2007). “Sec *955 tion 203(o) excludes from the definition of “hours worked,” in the context of the FLSA’s minimum wage and maximum hours provisions, 11 “time spent in changing clothes or washing at the beginning or end of each workday which was excluded from measured working time during…”
Sec'y United States Dep't of Labor v. Am. Future Sys., Inc., 873 F.3d 420 (3rd Cir. 2017). “13, 1964) (JA 1351-52) ("[I]f [break] periods are given and are of short duration (normally 20 minutes or less) they must be counted as hours worked and the employees must receive compensation for them. ... The way in which the employee utilizes his time during the rest periods…”
Ethelberth v. Choice Sec. Co., 91 F. Supp. 3d 339 (E.D.N.Y 2015). “” 29 U.S.C. § 208 (b)(1)(A). “Enterprise coverage has been interpreted broadly by the courts.”
Gemsco, Inc. v. Walling, 324 U.S. 244 (1945). “1060 , 1065, 29 U.S.C. § 208 (f). It would disregard the authority thus given by Congress to deny that the power to fix minimum wages carries with it the subsidiary power to forbid and to prevent evasion of *270 wages so fixed.”
Nicks v. Koch Meat Co., 260 F. Supp. 3d 942 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “29 U.S.C. § 208 (d) (defining employer as “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to [the plaintiff].”
Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc., 360 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2004). “” 29 U.S.C. § 208 (f). Preparation for market is included in secondary farming.”
Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs, 30 F. Supp. 995 (S.D. Cal. 1940). “29 U.S.C.A. § 208 (b). It is the duty of the Committee to recommend the highest wage and the classification necessary without curtailing employment.”
Mohammad Jahir v. Ryman Hosp. Props., 795 F.3d 442 (4th Cir. 2015). “In response, the Plaintiffs filed suit against the Defendants, alleging that the tip-pooling arrangement violated the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 208 (m), the 2009 Collective Bargaining Agreement between UNITE HERE and the Defendants, and the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law.”
— 29 U.S.C. § 208(e)(1) — 1 case
Gary Cmty. Sch. Corp. v. Powell, 906 N.E.2d 823 (Ind. 2009).
— 29 U.S.C. § 208(f) — 1 case
Pearson v. Walling, 138 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1943).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.