29 U.S.C. § 2107
Authority to prescribe regulations
Section effective 6 months after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Allen v. Sybase, Inc., 468 F.3d 642 (10th Cir. 2006).
Allen v. Sybase, Inc., 468 F.3d 642 (10th Cir. 2006). “'' 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). "The regulations are thus promulgated by the Department of Labor pursuant to statutory authority, and, if substantive, they have the force of law unless they are irreconcilable with the clear meaning of a statute, as revealed by its language, purpose,…”
Roberts v. Genting, 68 F.4th 81 (2d Cir. 2023). “29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). 6 The regulations implementing the WARN Act define, inter alia, the terms "single site of employment" and "operating unit.”
Easom v. US Well Servs., 37 F.4th 238 (5th Cir. 2022). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). “Such regulations shall, at a minimum, include interpretative regulations describing the methods by which employers may provide for appropriate service of notice as required by this chapter.”
Harbert v. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc., 391 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2004). “3 (i); see also 29 U.S.C. § 2107 . The focus of the regulation is in explaining when two or more different employment sites can be counted together as a “single site” for the purpose *1152 of aggregating employees to reach the 50-employee minimum.”
In Re APA Transp. Corp. Consol. Litig., 541 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2008). “29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). Here, the regulations promulgated by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) pertaining to “WARN Act enforcement” state that [e]nforeement of WARN will be through the courts, as provided in section 5 of the statute.”
John Ellis v. DHL Express, Incorpo, 633 F.3d 522 (7th Cir. 2011). “” 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). Before enacting the regulations currently codified at 20 C.”
Meson v. GATX Tech. Servs. Corp., 507 F.3d 803 (4th Cir. 2007). “Meson nevertheless claims that under Department of Labor regulations she is entitled to WARN Act coverage, because GTS’s Tampa, Florida headquarters, and not her Virginia office, is her “single site of employment.”
Bader v. N. Line Layers, Inc., 503 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2007). “3 (i); 2 see generally 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a) (authorizing the DOL to prescribe regulations carrying out the Act).”
In Re Organogenesis Inc., 316 B.R. 574 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2004). “29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a). The Department of Labor promulgates such regulations pursuant to statutory authority, and "if substantive, they have the force of law.”
Finnan v. LF Rothschild & Co., Inc., 726 F. Supp. 460 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “29 U.S.C. § 2107 . 1. Rothschild's motion to dismiss the Complaint Defendant's motion to dismiss presents the question of the meaning of the effective date of the Act.”
Robert Schmidt v. FCI Enter. LLC, 3 F.4th 95 (4th Cir. 2021). “The Act is supplemented by extensive Department of Labor regulations, see 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a), which we must give “controlling weight unless they are arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute,” Chevron, U.”
Judy Weekes-Walker v. Macon Cnty. Greyhound Park, Inc., 725 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2013). “See 29 U.S.C. § 2107 (a) (granting the DOL the ability to “prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out [the WARN Act]”); see also Chevron, U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.