29 U.S.C. § 2801
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, § 511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: Jimmie E. Small v. Elaine E. Chao, Sec'y of the Dep't of Labor, 398 F.3d 894 (7th Cir. 2005).
Jimmie E. Small v. Elaine E. Chao, Sec'y of the Dep't of Labor, 398 F.3d 894 (7th Cir. 2005). “The JTPA has since been superseded by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 2801 , etseq. See 29 U.S.C. § 2940 (b).”
Anthoine v. North Cent. Counties Consortium, 605 F.3d 740 (9th Cir. 2010). “Defendant-appellee North Central Counties Consortium (“NCCC”) is a public entity created by five California counties to administer the Workforce Investment Act (“WIA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. NCCC receives money from the state and federal governments to fund programs that…”
Winslow v. Aroostook Cnty., 736 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 2013). “Under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (“WIA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., Maine has obtained federal funding to strengthen local workforces and career opportunities.”
City of Beloit v. Local 643 of the Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Afl-Cio, 248 F.3d 650 (7th Cir. 2001). “The JTPA has since been superseded by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 2801 , etseq. See 29 U.S.C. § 2940(b).”
Morales v. NYS Dep't of Labor, 865 F. Supp. 2d 220 (N.D.N.Y. 2012). “CNY is a Syracuse-based nonprofit that began working with DOL to provide access to employment resources in 2004, using funds made available to it and the State through the Workforce Investment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. DOL moved its Syracuse jobs service office into a…”
United States Ex Rel. Ziebell v. Fox Valley Workforce Dev. Bd., Inc., 806 F.3d 946 (7th Cir. 2015). “Background The Fox Valley Workforce Development Board was formed in 2000 under the auspices of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, see 29 U.S.C. §§ 2801 et seq., a federal job-training program that provides funding to state-level investment boards, which in turn channel funds…”
Brown v. Rotenberg, 268 F. Supp. 3d 445 (W.D.N.Y. 2017). “Plaintiff claims that Defendants violated the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 2801 (since repealed and replaced, see 29 U.”
Slovinec v. Georgetown Univ., 268 F. Supp. 3d 55 (D.D.C. 2017). “He was accepted into, a program funded by the Workforce Investment Act (“WIA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2801 (repealed 2014). The WIA “provide[d] a range of workforce development activities administered through State and local employment offices .”
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Kamehameha Schs./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est., 295 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Haw. 2003). “); (H) the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 ( 29 U.S.C. §§ 2801 et seq.); and (I) the Older Americans Act of 1965 ( 42 U.”
State Bd. of Educ. v. Mullins, 31 So. 3d 91 (Ala. 2009). “1 The Consortia were a result of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (“WIA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq„ which superseded the Job Training Partnership Act, 29 U.”
Mun. of San Juan v. Human Resources Occupational Dev. Council, 371 F. Supp. 2d 52 (D.P.R. 2005). “1 Per Plaintiffs’ allegations, this action arose out of the HRODC’s decision to audit the San Juan Puerto Rico International Fashion Center pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Workforce Investment Act (“WIA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2801 et seq. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants’…”
Greo v. Trujillo, 270 F. Supp. 2d 189 (D.P.R. 2003). “The section clearly refers to “violations of any requirement of this chapter [ 29 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq.]”, thus including not only § 2938 but the entire statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.