29 U.S.C. § 436
Retention of records
Every person required to file any report under this subchapter shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the documents filed with the Secretary may be verified, explained, or clarified, and checked for accuracy and completeness, and shall include vouchers, worksheets, receipts, and applicable resolutions, and shall keep such records available for examination for a period of not less than five years after the filing of the documents based on the information which they contain.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1961–2018 · leading case: Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of Am., 344 F. Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1972).
Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of Am., 344 F. Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1972). “claring the election held by the United Mine Workers of America, hereinafter referred to as the defendant or the UMWA, on December 9, 1969, null and void and directing the conduct of a new election under the supervision of the plaintiff, and for an order directing and compelling…”
Manuel M. Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Ass'n, Fred Vogel, & C.R. Paty, 987 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1993). “29 U.S.C. § 436 provides: "Every person required to file any report under this subchapter shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the documents filed with the…”
Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen Local 760, & James Farrington v. Terry C. Morley, Vincent Kuntz & Lumina Brownlee, 378 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1967). “Appellees contend that Congress, in requiring that supporting records be kept for five years ( 29 U.S.C. § 436 ), in effect established a five-year statute of limitations for actions under § 431 (c).”
Gem Fin. Serv., Inc. v. City of N.Y., 298 F. Supp. 3d 464 (E.D.N.Y 2018). “1982), concerned 29 U.S.C. § 436 , a statute that requires "contents of the reports and documents filed" with the United States Department of labor to be "public information," 29 U.”
United States v. Peter Ottley, 509 F.2d 667 (2d Cir. 1975). “§ 501 (c) by leasing and maintain *669 ing, at union expense, an automobile for the personal use of Byrne’s wife, and on one count of failure to maintain records in sufficient detail to substantiate Ottley’s claim for weekly reimbursed cash expenses, as required by 29 U.S.C. §…”
United States v. Bernard G. Rubin, 559 F.2d 975 (5th Cir. 1977). “§ 7206 (1); and failure to keep labor union records, 29 U.S.C. §§ 436 , 439. The court imposed concurrent sentences on all counts up to a maximum of five years imprisonment.”
Am. Fed'n of Labor & Cong. of Indus. Organizations v. Chao, 409 F.3d 377 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “at 434 ; see also 29 U.S.C. § 436 . With the exception of the dollar filing threshold, these reporting requirements remained substantially unchanged for more than four decades.”
United States v. Tommy Briscoe, 65 F.3d 576 (7th Cir. 1995). “Under 29 U.S.C. § 436 , the union is required to maintain and keep all records of the financial operations for a period of five years from the date at which the union files its annual report regarding those operations.”
United States v. John Stubin, 446 F.2d 457 (3rd Cir. 1971). “Count twenty-three charged that Stubin failed to maintain union records crediting the members with dues paid to the Union as required by 29 U.S.C.A. § 436 . 3 The last count, twenty-four, charged that Stubin failed to keep Union records and made false entries in records in…”
United States v. George Snyder, 668 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1982). “The records examined in 1974 were union business records, required to be kept by law, 29 U.S.C. § 436 , and subject to inspection by the Department of Labor.”
United States v. McKay, 506 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (S.D. Fla. 2007). “§ 1027 (Count Eleven charging Michael McKay only), Failure to Maintain Records as Required by the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act ("LMRDA”) in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 436 and 439(a) (Count Twelve), and False Entry in Records as Required by the LMRDA in violation…”
United States v. Thomas J. Haggerty, 419 F.2d 1003 (7th Cir. 1970). “29 U.S.C. § 436 requires persons required to file reports to maintain records on the matters required to be reported.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.