U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 11— LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE PROCEDURE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VII— MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

29 U.S.C. § 524a

Elimination of racketeering activities threat; State legislation governing collective bargaining representative

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding this or any other Act regulating labor-management relations, each State shall have the authority to enact and enforce, as part of a comprehensive statutory system to eliminate the threat of pervasive racketeering activity in an industry that is, or over time has been, affected by such activity, a provision of law that applies equally to employers, employees, and collective bargaining representatives, which provision of law governs service in any position in a local labor organization which acts or seeks to act in that State as a collective bargaining representative pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.], in the industry that is subject to that program.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Int'l Union John Wilhelm Donald M. Taylor Mark D. Atkinson v. Nevada Gaming Comm'n, 984 F.2d 1507 (9th Cir. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Int'l Union John Wilhelm Donald M. Taylor Mark D. Atkinson v. Nevada Gaming Comm'n, 984 F.2d 1507 (9th Cir. 1993). · cites it 3× “to the preemptive effect of those statutes, but contend that a later enactment by Congress as an amendment to the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. § 524a, further restricts the exception to the overall preemption.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gov't OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS (D.V.I. 2021). “12 The Court also notes that after Brown was decided, Congress enacted 29 U.S.C. § 524a—cited by Defendant VICCC (Dkt.”
Casiano v. Afscme Council 63 Officials (D.N.J. 2025). “§ 524 or 29 U.S.C. § 524a, neither statute creates a cause of action—the former provides that the chapter does not “impair or diminish the authority of any State to enact and enforce general criminal laws,” 29 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.