29 U.S.C. § 526
Applicability of administrative procedure provisions
The provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5 shall be applicable to the issuance, amendment, or rescission of any rules or regulations, or any adjudication authorized or required pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2021 · leading case: Warshauer v. Solis, 577 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2009).
Warshauer v. Solis, 577 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2009). “29 U.S.C. § 526 . The APA requires all federal agencies to publish proposed rules in the Federal Register in order to provide the public with notice and an opportunity to comment.”
Dunlop v. Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560 (1975). “5 Section 606 of the LMRDA, 29 U. S. C. §526 , provides: “The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act shall be *565 applicable to .”
Harold A. Boire, Reg'l Dir., Twelfth Region, Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. The Miami Herald Publ'g Co., 343 F.2d 17 (5th Cir. 1965). “” (Emphasis added) The italicized portion was added to the statute in 1959 to replace an earlier sentence denying the right of franchise to economic strikers who were not entitled to reinstatement.”
Walter Bachowski v. Peter Brennan, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor Andunited Steelworkers of Am., 502 F.2d 79 (3rd Cir. 1974). “The Secretary argues that § 606 of the L-ilRDA, 29 U.S.C. § 526 , which governs tlie apxilicability of the APA to actions taken pursuant to tlie L-MRDA, does not provide plaintiff here a basis for judicial review, since the Secretary’s determination not to bring suit is not an…”
Schonfeld v. Wirtz, 258 F. Supp. 705 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). “29 U.S.C. § 526 . 5 U.S.C. § 1009 , as far as pertinent, prpvides: “Except so far as * * * agency action is by law committed to agency discretion— ****** (e) [The reviewing court shall] * * * set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (1) arbitrary,…”
Singleton v. Cory, 465 F. Supp. 14 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “It is unnecessary to deal with plaintiff’s contention that 29 U.S.C. § 526 applies.”
Brock v. Westside Local 174, 643 F. Supp. 602 (E.D. Mich. 1986). “See also 29 U.S.C. § 526 (providing for application of Chapter 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”
Bachowski v. Brennan, 421 U.S. 578 (1974). “The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which is applicable to the LMRDA, 29 U. S. C. § 526 , states: “Prompt notice shall be given of the denial in whole or in part of a written application, petition, or other request of an interested person made in connection with any agency…”
Howard v. Hodgson, 356 F. Supp. 692 (E.D. Mo. 1973). “Judge Regan, of this Court, disagreed with the application of this latter holding to the facts of the case before him stating: Is the Secretary’s finding of want of probable cause (or his failure to find probable cause) subject to review under the Administrative Procedure Act?…”
United States v. Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “See 29 U.S.C. § 526 . Those robust procedures for administrative and judicial review are supplemented, not obstructed, by the additional scrutiny and review that will be provided through the office of the Monitor that will be appointed under the consent decree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.