29 U.S.C. § 6
Annual and special reports to President and Congress
The Commissioner of Labor Statistics shall annually make a report in writing to the President and Congress, of the information collected and collated by him, and containing such recommendations as he may deem calculated to promote the efficiency of the department. He is also authorized to make special reports on particular subjects whenever required to do so by the President or either House of Congress, or when he shall think the subjects in his charge require it. He shall, on or before the 15th day of March in each year, make a report in detail to Congress of all moneys expended under his direction during the preceding fiscal year.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: Cole v. Gaming Ent., L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Del. 2002).
Cole v. Gaming Ent., L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Del. 2002). “, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 6 , et seq. Presently before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.”
Pub. Citizen Health Rsch. Grp. v. United States Dep't of Labor, 557 F.3d 165 (3d Cir. 2009). “§ 6 (b)(5)] to require setting multiple PELs based on the lowest level particular industries or operations could achieve,” and that, in the face of statutory silence, “OSHA has the authority to adopt the reasonable interpretation that it judges will best carry out the purposes…”
Alight Solutions, LLC v. Thomson, No. 1:20-cv-03043 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 22, 2023). “See 29 U.S.C. § 6 (a)(1). Because Thomson elects to use the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework, she must show evidence that “(1) she is a member of a protected class, (2) she was meeting the defendant’s 2 The parties do not dispute that “Connecticut antidiscrimination…”
Bd. of Trs. of the Constr. Indus. & Laborers Jt. Pension Trust v. John Jory, LLC, No. 2:23-cv-00782 (D. Nev. Apr. 22, 2024). “The Pension Trust is an “employee benefit pension plan” as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 6 1002(2); and a “multiemployer plan” as defined in 29 U.”
Pub Citizen Health v. OSHA, No. 06-1818 (3d Cir. Feb. 23, 2009). “OSHA stated that it “has not interpreted [ 29 U.S.C. § 6 (b)(5)] to require setting multiple PELs based on the lowest level particular industries or operations could achieve,” and that, in the face of statutory silence, “OSHA has the authority to adopt the reasonable 2 Likewise,…”
Murdy v. Nashua Sch. Dist., No. CV-05- 174-PB, 2006 WL 3730092 (D.N.H. Dec. 19, 2006). “See 29 U.S.C. § 6 2 6 (c)(1)-(2); RSA § 354-A:21-a, 22.”
Cadegan v. McCarron, No. CV-00-540-JD (D.N.H. Aug. 6, 2002). “1997) (construing plan asset for purposes of 29 U.S.C. § 6 6 4 ) ; Motion Picture Lab.”
Tucker v. Kingsbury Corp., No. CV-94-341-SD (D.N.H. June 19, 1996). “6 0 2 , as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 6 2 1 , et seq. (1985 & Supp.”
Kopf v. Chloride Power, No. CV-94-391-SD (D.N.H. Jan. 12, 1995). “602 (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 6 2 1 , et seq. (1985)) and (2) employment discrimination based on disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Pub.”
Piascik-Lambeth v. Textron Auto., 2000 DNH 264 (D.N.H. 2000). “The plaintiff filed suit on May 2 4 , 2000, alleging violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 6 2 1 , et seq. (“ADEA”); violation of the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 29 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.