29 U.S.C. § 629
Criminal penalties
Whoever shall forcibly resist, oppose, impede, intimidate or interfere with a duly authorized representative of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission while it is engaged in the performance of duties under this chapter shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both: Provided, however, That no person shall be imprisoned under this section except when there has been a prior conviction hereunder.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575 (1978).
Lorillard v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575 (1978). “9 Section 10 of the ADEA, 29 U. S. C. § 629 , establishes criminal penalties for interference with the performance of an authorized representative of the Secretary when he is engaged in the performance of his duties under the Act.”
Trachtenberg v. Dep't of Educ., 937 F. Supp. 2d 460 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). “1998) (before bringing an ADEA suit, plaintiff in New York “must file an EEOC charge within the earlier of 300 days after the alleged unlawful practice or, if a complaint was filed with the state agency, 30 days after receiving notice of termination of proceedings under the…”
Xuelin Zhuang v. Datacard Corp., 414 F.3d 849 (8th Cir. 2005). “§ 2000e, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 629 et al, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, M.”
William L. Clark v. Resistoflex Co., a Div. of Unidynamics Corp. & Its Successor Crane Resistoflex Co., a Div. of Crane Co., 854 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1988). “The case was thus remanded also for a determi *768 nation as to when plaintiffs secured counsel—the means of knowledge—or acquired actual knowledge “so as to trigger the running of the 180-day filing requirement of 29 U.S.C. § 629 (d).” Id. at 762 . In sum, then, Charlier stands…”
Schreiber v. WORLDCO, LLC, 324 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “Friedfertig allege that defendant Worldco, LLC (“Worldco”) wrongfully discharged them, purportedly because of their age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 629 et seq.; the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law §…”
Elliott v. British Tourist Auth., 172 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “” 29 U.S.C. § 629 (a)(1). The critical issue in an ADEA case, as in any discrimination case, is one of proof of discriminatory intent on the part of the defendant.”
In Re Paolino, 71 B.R. 576 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987). “1979) (under 29 U.S.C. § 629 (b), disallowing all expenses not included in 28 U.”
McConnell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc., 802 F. Supp. 1484 (E.D. Tex. 1992). “1989); 29 U.S.C. § 629 (b). An ADEA violation is willful for the purposes of assessing liquidated damages only if the employer knew, or showed reckless disregard for the matter of whether its conduct was prohibited by the ADEA.”
Nat'l Cmty. Reinvestment Coalition v. Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co., 573 F. Supp. 2d 70 (D.D.C. 2008). “…claims.” Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss at 30 (citing Title VII, § 703(a)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l); ADEA § 4(a)(1), 29 U.S.C. § 629 (a)(1)). They argue that the absence of an “effects” provision comparable to provisions in Title VII § 703(a)(2) and ADEA § 4(a)(2)…”
Moorehead v. New York City Transit Auth., 385 F. Supp. 2d 248 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “, as amended (“Title VII”), with respect to his race and national origin, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 629 et seq. (the “ADEA”). The parties engaged in discovery and the instant motion for summary judgment followed.”
Golden v. McDermott, Will & Emery, 702 N.E.2d 581 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “1985), a case under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ( 29 U.S.C. §§ 629 through 634 (1994)) that seems contrary to this principle.”
Daniels v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 797 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (D. Kan. 2011). “61 The FPA amended 29 U.S.C. § 629 (d)(3) of the ADEA and 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.