U.S. Code » Title 29 » Chapter CHAPTER 16— VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND OTHER REHABILITATION SERVICES

29 U.S.C. § 703

Advance funding

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 29 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) For the purpose of affording adequate notice of funding available under this chapter, appropriations under this chapter are authorized to be included in the appropriation Act for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which they are available for obligation.(b) In order to effect a transition to the advance funding method of timing appropriation action, the authority provided by subsection (a) of this section shall apply notwithstanding that its initial application will result in the enactment in the same year (whether in the same appropriation Act or otherwise) of two separate appropriations, one for the then current fiscal year and one for the succeeding fiscal year.(Pub. L. 93–112, § 4, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1097.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 703, Pub. L. 93–112, § 4, Sept. 26, 1973, 87 Stat. 358, related to advance funding, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, § 403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1093.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: Wilson v. Amtrak Nat'l R.R., 824 F. Supp. 55 (D. Maryland 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wilson v. Amtrak Nat'l R.R., 824 F. Supp. 55 (D. Maryland 1992). “ANALYSIS To support his claim of discrimination, the plaintiff cites various provisions, including the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 703 ; the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.”
Robinson v. Kansas, 117 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (D. Kan. 2000). “§ 2000d, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., and the plaintiffs’ rights to Due Process and Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Abler v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore (D. Maryland 2022). “2 Plaintiff appears to mistakenly cite to 29 U.S.C. § 703 , et seq. in his motion papers when referring to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 instead of the correct citation: 29 U.”
Tynes v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore (D. Maryland 2023). “22 Defendant also moves for summary judgment on the basis that “Plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §703 et seq.” ECF 11 ¶ 5. Specifically, defendant argues that plaintiff has not engaged in the…”
Onwudiwe v. Becerra (D. Maryland 2023). “§ 12112-12117 , and Sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 703 , arising from incidents occurring from January 18, 2018 to June 26, 2019, including: (1) unwarranted criticism and reprimands between January 18, 2018 and June 14, 2019; (2) disparate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.