30 U.S.C. § 1753

Relation to other laws

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 30 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Supplemental nature of chapter

The penalties and authorities provided in this chapter are supplemental to, and not in derogation of, any penalties or authorities contained in any other provision of law.

(b) Responsibilities of Secretary related to minerals on Federal and Indian lands

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to reduce the responsibilities of the Secretary to ensure prompt and proper collection of revenues from coal, uranium and other energy and nonenergy minerals on Federal and Indian lands, or to restrain the Secretary from entering into cooperative agreements or other appropriate arrangements with States and Indian tribes to share royalty management responsibilities and activities for such minerals under existing authorities.

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to enlarge, diminish, or otherwise affect the authority or responsibility of the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior or of the Comptroller General of the United States.

(d) Lands and land interests entrusted to Tennessee Valley Authority unaffected

No provision of this chapter impairs or affects lands and interests in land entrusted to the Tennessee Valley Authority.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title III, § 304, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2461; Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, § 901(j)(2), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3290.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–362 substituted “Nothing” for “Except as expressly provided in section 1752(b) of this title, nothing”.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2003 · leading case: Shoshone Indian Tribe of Wind River Reservation v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 77 (Fed. Cl. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Shoshone Indian Tribe of Wind River Reservation v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 77 (Fed. Cl. 2003). · cites it 4× “at 99-100 (citing 30 U.S.C. § 1753 (b) (Jt.App. at A-25)). Plaintiffs counter that cooperative agreements under FOGRMA are intended to enhance, not diminish, 'the government’s trust responsibilities.”

Amax Land Co. v. Quarterman, Cynthia, 181 F.3d 1356 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “Finally, the government points to FOGRMA § 304, which provides that “[t]he penalties and authorities provided in this chapter are supplemental to, and not in derogation of, any penalties or authorities contained in any other- provision of law,” 30 U.S.C. § 1753 (a) (1994). While…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.