In the case of lands bona fide entered as agricultural, and not withdrawn or classified as mineral at the time of entry, but not including lands claimed under any railroad grant, the entryman or patentee, or assigns, where assignment was made prior to January 1, 1918, if the entry has been patented with the mineral right reserved, shall be entitled to a preference right to a permit and to a lease, as herein provided, in case of discovery; and within an area not greater than a township such entryman and patentees, or assigns holding restricted patents may combine their holdings, not to exceed two thousand five hundred and sixty acres for the purpose of making joint application. Leases executed under this section and embracing only lands so entered shall provide for the payment of a royalty of not less than 12½ per centum as to such areas within the permit as may not be included within the discovery lease to which the permittee is entitled under section 223 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1934–1980 · leading case:
Walliker v. Escott, 608 P.2d 1272 (Wyo. 1980).
Walliker v. Escott, 608 P.2d 1272 (Wyo. 1980).
“445 [ 30 U.S.C.A. § 229 ])” 268 P. at 185 . In June of 1921, Tendolle filed an application for an oil and gas prospecting permit.”
Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. R. E. Nordwick, 378 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1967).
“However, entrymen were granted a preference right to lease oil and gas deposits in their lands ( 30 U.S.C. § 229 (1964); *430 Skeen v. Lynch, .”
Bourdieu v. Pac. W. Oil Co., 80 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1935).
“Section 20 of this act ( 30 U.S.C.A. § 229 ) provides: “In the case of lands bona fide entered as agricultural, and not withdrawn or classified as mineral at the time of entry * * * the entryman * * * if the entry has been patented with the mineral right reserved, shall be…”
Bourdieu v. Pac. W. Oil Co., 8 F. Supp. 407 (S.D. Cal. 1934).
“It is contended by the complainant that the said two corporations hold the lease in so far as it covers the land here involved in trust for Bourdieu, and that the defendants should be required in equity to transfer it to him because at the time the defendants acquired the lease…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.