30 U.S.C. § 32
Findings by jury; costs
If, in any action brought pursuant to section 30 of this title, title to the ground in controversy shall not be established by either party, the jury shall so find, and judgment shall be entered according to the verdict. In such case costs shall not be allowed to either party, and the claimant shall not proceed in the land office or be entitled to a patent for the ground in controversy until he shall have perfected his title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1913–2003 · leading case: Bowen v. Sil-Flo Corp., 451 P.2d 626 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969).
Bowen v. Sil-Flo Corp., 451 P.2d 626 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969). “Accordingly, the judgment must be modified to contain a declaration as required by 30 U.S.C.A. § 32 that neither party established right to possession to areas outside of the four lode claims in question.”
Billings v. Cape Cod Child Dev. Prog., Inc., 270 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D. Mass. 2003). “§ 2465 (wrongful seizure of property under forfeiture statute), and 30 U.S.C. § 32 (mineral lands claim), and 28 U.”
Hinchman v. Ripinsky, 202 F. 625 (9th Cir. 1913). “140 [ 30 U.S.C.A. § 32 ] ), so that if, in any action brought in pursuance thereof, the title to the ground in controversy be not established by either party, the costs shall not be allowed to either party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.