Notes of Decisions
United States v. E-Gold, Ltd., 550 F. Supp. 2d 82 (D.D.C. 2008).
· cites it 11× “The only definition in the United States Code for a “money transmitting business” per se is at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 5330 defines a money transmitting business as one that, inter alia, is required to report certain cash or currency transactions to the Internal Revenue…”
United States v. Talebnejad, 342 F. Supp. 2d 346 (D. Maryland 2004).
· cites it 13× “t’s charge that, from in or about December 2000 through in or about December 2002, Defendants conspired to violate the law regarding the operation of money transmitting businesses (Count I), either because the businesses were unlicensed by the State of Maryland or because…”
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 621 F.3d 205 (2d Cir. 2010).
· cites it 4× “§ 1960 (b)(1)(A), it concluded that the government had not proved Mazza-Alaluf guilty of failing to comply with federal money transmitting registration requirements codified at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 , see 18 U.S.C. § 1960 (b)(1)(B).”
United States v. Banki, 685 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “; (B) fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under [ 31 U.S.C. § 5330 , which require money-transmitting businesses to register with the Secretary of the Treasury] .”
United States v. Uddin, 365 F. Supp. 2d 825 (E.D. Mich. 2005).
· cites it 7× “” Defendant does not dispute that he operated a money transmitting business nor does he dispute that the business was not registered with the Secretary of Treasury as required under 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Defendant, however, maintains that, in addition to alleging that he operated a…”
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
· cites it 5× “§ 1960 and 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 1960 makes it a crime to “fail[ ] to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section[.”
United States v. Talebnejad, 460 F.3d 563 (4th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 8× “The businesses were not licensed under Maryland law, nor were they registered pursuant to 31 U.S.C.A. § 5330 (West 2003). In UNITED STATES v.”
United States v. Murgio, 209 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).
“mx “failed to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements set forth in [ 31 U.S.C. § 5330 ] and the regulations prescribed thereunder,” in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Dimitrov, 546 F.3d 409 (7th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “ness” means a money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce in any manner or degree and— (A) is intentionally operated without an appropriate money transmitting license in a State where such operation is punishable as a misdemeanor or felony under…”
Tay v. Green, 2022 OK 37 (Okla. 2022).
· cites it 2× “" The statute references 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (2018 & Supp. 2020), which defines "money transmitting business" as follows: any business other than the United States Postal Service which-- (A) provides check cashing, currency exchange, or money transmitting or remittance services, or…”
United States v. $215, 587.22 in U.S. Currency, 306 F. Supp. 3d 213 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“Section 1960(b)(1)(B) As noted above, § 1960's federal-registration offense, § 1960(b)(1)(B), defines an unlicensed money transmitting business as a "money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce" and "fails to comply with registration requirements"…”
United States v. Keleta, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006).
· cites it 3× “1 The *2 court in Talebnejad held “that 31 U.S.C. § 5330 by implication also incorporates a mens rea requirement, i.”
United States v. Banki, 660 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 2011).
· cites it 2× “; (B) fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under [ 31 U.S.C. § 5330 , which require money-transmitting businesses to register with the Secretary of the Treasury] .”
United States v. $1,399,313.74 in United States Currency, 592 F. Supp. 2d 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).
“§ 5330 (a)(1) ("Any person who owns or controls a money transmitting business shall register the business (whether or not the business is licensed as a money transmitting business in any State) with the Secretary of the Treasury” not later than 180 days after the business…”
United States v. Harmon (D.D.C. 2020).
· cites it 10× “31 U.S.C. § 5330 (a)(1). According to Count Two, defendant violated § 1960(a) by (a) operating Helix without the appropriate money transmitting license in the District, where failure to obtain the proper license is a felony, see D.”
United States of Am. v. Ian Freeman, 2023 DNH 106P (D.N.H. 2023).
· cites it 6× “Specifically, in 2013, FinCEN issued guidance opining that an “exchanger” of virtual currency (as defined in FinCEN’s regulations) that “(1) accepts and transmits a convertible virtual currency or (2) buys or sells convertible virtual currency for any reason is a money…”
United States v. Freeman (1st Cir. 2025).
· cites it 3× “272 , 328 (2001) (codified as amended at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (d)(1)). In this language difference lies the rub of Freeman's grievance.”
United States v. Goklu (2d Cir. 2026).
· cites it 3× “As relevant here, an “unlicensed money transmitting business” includes a money transmitting business that “fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements” under 31 U.S.C. § 5330 or its implementing regulations.”
United States v. Harmon (D.D.C. 2021).
· cites it 2× “1, by operating a money transmitting business without an appropriate money transmitting license in the District of Columbia (“state licensing” prong), under §1960(b)(1)(A), and failing to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements of the Bank Secrecy…”
United States v. $510,000 United States Currency (W.D. Ark. 2022).
· cites it 2× “31 U.S.C. § 5330 requires that a money transmitting business be registered with the Secretary of the Treasury and defines “money transmitting business” as any business other than the United States Postal Service which— (A) provides check cashing, currency exchange, or money…”
In re Ripple Labs Inc. Litig. (N.D. Cal. 2020).
“Sales Acknowledged in Defendants’ May 2015 Settlement 22 Agreement 23 In May 2015, defendant Ripple and defendant XRP II entered a settlement 24 agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California 25 (“USAO”) for violation of the Bank…”
United States v. Banki, 660 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 2012).
“; see 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (a)(1) ("Any person who owns or controls a money transmitting business shall register the business (whether or not the business is licensed as a money transmitting business in any State) with the Secretary of the Treasury .”
United States v. Banki, 660 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 2012).
“; see 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (a)(1) ("Any person who owns or controls a money transmitting business shall register the business (whether or not the business is licensed as a money transmitting business in any State) with the Secretary of the Treasury .”
United States v. Banki, 660 F.3d 665 (2d Cir. 2012).
“; see 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (a)(1) ("Any person who owns or controls a money transmitting business shall register the - 28 - business (whether or not the business is licensed as a money transmitting business in any State) with the Secretary of the Treasury .”
United States v. Donald Hellinger, 538 F. App'x 211 (3rd Cir. 2013).
“PPC did not register with the United States Department of the Treasury as a money-transmitting business, as required by 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . After Appellants pled guilty, the District Court determined that U.”
United States v. Rahman, 417 F. Supp. 2d 725 (E.D.N.C. 2006).
“The court analyzed only the definitional prong in section 1960(b)(1)(B) relating to the failure to abide by the requirements of 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Id. at 826 . Unlike Uddin , the indictment in this ease alleges only that the defendants were not in compliance with state licensing…”
United States v. Dimitrov, Stefan (7th Cir. 2008).
“Under the amended § 1960, the government no longer need prove that a defendant was aware of state licensing requirements or that he knew about the federal registration requirements found at 31 U.S.C. § 5330 (requiring owners or controllers of money transmitting businesses to…”
— 31 U.S.C. § 5330(d)(1)(B) — 1 case
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
“§ 1960 and 31 U.S.C. § 5330 . Section 1960 makes it a crime to “fail[ ] to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section[.”
— 31 U.S.C. § 5330(d)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Goklu (2d Cir. 2026).
“As relevant here, an “unlicensed money transmitting business” includes a money transmitting business that “fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements” under 31 U.S.C. § 5330 or its implementing regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.