31 U.S.C. § 5363
Prohibition on acceptance of any financial instrument for unlawful Internet gambling
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2025 · leading case: United States v. Rubin, 743 F.3d 31 (2d Cir. 2014).
United States v. Rubin, 743 F.3d 31 (2d Cir. 2014). “§ 371 and 31 U.S.C. § 5363 , (2) conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Lyons, 740 F.3d 702 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “” 31 U.S.C. § 5363 . “Unlawful Internet gambling,” in turn, is defined as “to place, receive, or otherwise knowingly transmit a bet or wager by any means which involves .”
State of California v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, 898 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2018). “” 31 U.S.C. § 5363 . Unlawful internet gambling occurs when an individual places or receives a “bet or wager by any means which involves the use, at least in part, of the Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or State law in the State or…”
West Flagler Assocs., Ltd. v. Debra Haaland, 71 F.4th 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2023). “31 U.S.C. § 5363 . This claim suffers from a similar flaw as the Wire Act claim.”
Interactive Media Ent. & Gaming Ass'n v. Attorney Gen. of the United States, 580 F.3d 113 (3rd Cir. 2009). “31 U.S.C. § 5363 . The Act defines “unlawful Internet gambling” as “to place, receive, or otherwise knowingly transmit a bet or wager by any means which involves the use, at least in part, of the Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or State…”
In Re Baum, 386 B.R. 649 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2008). “UIGEA prohibits the acceptance of most financial instruments, including credit cards, for “unlawful Internet gambling,” 31 U.S.C. § 5363 (1). “Unlawful Internet gambling,” in turn, is defined as using the internet to place or receive a bet or wager where doing so would be…”
Rousso v. State, 204 P.3d 243 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “" 31 U.S.C. § 5363 . The statute specifically defines "unlawful Internet gambling" as transmitting wagers by any means that "involves the use, at least in part, of the Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or State law.”
Rousso v. State, 149 Wash. App. 344 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “” 31 U.S.C. § 5363 . The statute specifically defines “unlawful Internet gambling” as transmitting wagers by any means that “involves the use, at least in part, of the *354 Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or State law.”
United States v. Dicristina, 886 F. Supp. 2d 164 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “31 U.S.C. § 5363 . It states that “unlawful Internet gambling” is “placing], receiving], or otherwise knowingly transmitting] a bet or wager by any means which involves the use, at least in part, of the Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or…”
United States v. Lyons, 870 F. Supp. 2d 281 (D. Mass. 2012). “§ 7206 (1); and 31 U.S.C. § 5363 (3). . She pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the filing of false tax returns.”
Soucek (N.D. Cal. 2025). “§ 1955 , and the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, 31 U.S.C. § 5363 . In his motion to dismiss, Said argues that Robux are not “things of value” within the meaning of those four Penal Code provisions because they are virtual items that the plaintiffs cannot convert…”
United States v. Ayo, 801 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (S.D. Ala. 2011). “Counts Four and Five charge the defendant with accepting, in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful internet gambling, the proceeds of credit extended to or on behalf of such other person, in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5363 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . The alleged…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.