33 U.S.C. § 144
Repealed. Pub. L. 88–131, § 3, Sept. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 194
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1954–1973 · leading case: Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc. v. The Batory Gdynia-Am. Shipping Lines, Ltd. v. Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc, 215 F.2d 228 (2d Cir. 1954).
Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc. v. The Batory Gdynia-Am. Shipping Lines, Ltd. v. Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc, 215 F.2d 228 (2d Cir. 1954). “§ 144(a); which defined a seaplane as a “flying boat and any other aircraft designed to manoeuvre on the water”, 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (c); and which also provided for a specified code of signals for use “When a vessel or seaplane on the water is in distress and requires assistance…”
United States v. Moran Towing & Transp. Co., Inc., United States of Am. v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 374 F.2d 656 (4th Cir. 1967). “§ 3 and 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (c) (i) (except a seaplane), it is defined as “every description of water craft used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water.”
Petition of Porter, 272 F. Supp. 282 (S.D. Tex. 1967). “33 U.S.C.A. §§ 144 -147d; 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 151-232 ; 33 U.”
Hark v. Antilles Airboats, Inc., 355 F. Supp. 683 (D.V.I. 1973). “I The principal question is whether admiralty jurisdiction is appropriate when an aircraft suffers an accident in navigable waters.”
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 235 F. Supp. 569 (D. Maryland 1964). “The term vessel is defined in 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (c) (i), for the purposes of the International Rules for Navigation at Sea, as follows: “the *579 word ‘vessel’ includes every description of water craft, other than a seaplane on the water, used or capable of being used as a means…”
Yaeger v. The Alten, 167 F. Supp. 617 (D. Or. 1958). “The collision occurred some 55 minutes prior to sunrise and thus, under 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (b), the Breezy Bill was required to comply with the International Rules concerning port and starboard running lights, set out in 33 U.”
Timur Fishing Corp. v. Cap'n Bill, Inc., 160 F. Supp. 563 (D. Mass. 1958). “The towing rule requires a prolonged blast, (four to six seconds, Rule 1, 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (c) (xi)), followed by two short blasts, at least once a minute.”
— 33 U.S.C. § 144(a) — 1 case
Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc. v. The Batory Gdynia-Am. Shipping Lines, Ltd. v. Lambros Seaplane Base, Inc, 215 F.2d 228 (2d Cir. 1954). “§ 144(a); which defined a seaplane as a “flying boat and any other aircraft designed to manoeuvre on the water”, 33 U.S.C.A. § 144 (c); and which also provided for a specified code of signals for use “When a vessel or seaplane on the water is in distress and requires assistance…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.