33 U.S.C. § 529
Repealed. Pub. L. 100–17, title I, § 135(e), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 174
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1956–2016 · leading case: Molinari v. New York Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 838 F. Supp. 718 (E.D.N.Y 1993).
Molinari v. New York Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 838 F. Supp. 718 (E.D.N.Y 1993). “It also limited specifically *722 the use of tolls collected on “interstate bridges” for bridge related purposes, 33 U.S.C.A. § 529 (1986) (repealed 1987), and mandated that the tolls on such bridges be “just and reasonable.”
Auto. Club of New York, Inc. v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 706 F. Supp. 264 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “175, reprinted in 1987 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.”
City of Burlington v. Turner, 336 F. Supp. 594 (S.D. Iowa 1972). “33 U.S.C. § 529 . 15 . Relation of Toll Facilities to the Federal Aid Highway Program, H.”
AAA Ne. v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 221 F. Supp. 3d 374 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “It is worth mentioning that the earlier case from 1979 did not involve a Dormant Commerce Clause claim; rather, the claims were brought under the General Bridge Act of 1946, 33 U.S.C. § 529 , and a former version of the Highway Act, the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, 33 U.”
Auto. Club of New York, Inc. v. Cox, 592 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1979). “However, another section, 33 U.S.C. § 529 , provided: If tolls are charged for the use of an interstate bridge constructed or taken over or acquired by a State or States or by any municipality or other political subdivision or public agency thereof, under the provisions of…”
Delaware River Jt. Toll Bridge Comm'n v. Miller, 147 F. Supp. 270 (E.D. Pa. 1956). “33 U.S. C.A. § 529) ; 61 Stat. 752 , Act Aug.”
Auto. Club of New York, Inc. v. Cox, 444 F. Supp. 174 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “506, 33 U.S.C. § 529 . No similar limitation was contained in the 1906 Bridge Act.”
Delaware River Port Auth. v. Tiemann, 403 F. Supp. 1117 (D.N.J. 1975). “Consequently, in exempting the Authority from the thirty-year amortization requirement of § 506, 33 U.S.C. § 529 , Congress sought to limit the revenues retained by the DRPA.”
Wallace v. City of Rock Island, 198 F. Supp. 73 (S.D. Ill. 1961). “The theory of action underlying each count of the complaint is that the bond ordinance insofar as it permits bridge revenue funds to be transferred to defendant, is a violation of the toll provisions of Public Law 446, as amended, 1 33 U.S.C.A. § 529 2 and *75 is an invalid tax…”
Wallace v. City of Rock Island, 303 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1962). “Plaintiff contends that insofar as the ordinance permits such transfer of bridge revenue, the ordinance is in violation of Public Law 446, as amended ( 33 U.S.C.A. § 529 ), and an invalid tax on interstate commerce in violation of the Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.