The portion of the waterway in which is located the West River in the town of West Haven, Connecticut, and the city of New Haven, Connecticut, lying northerly of a line extending north 85 degrees 54 minutes 43.5 seconds east, from a point (1,158.535 feet from the most westerly corner of the existing bulkhead and pier line) whose coordinates in the Corps of Engineers Harbor Line System are north 4,616.76 and west 9,450.80, is declared to be a nonnavigable water of the United States within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.
The line hereinbefore described shall be established as a combined pierhead and bulkhead line of the West River.
Any project heretofore authorized by an Act of Congress, insofar as such project relates to the above-described portion of the West River, is hereby abandoned.
The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1979–1984 · leading case:
Loving v. Alexander, 548 F. Supp. 1079 (W.D. Va. 1982).
Loving v. Alexander, 548 F. Supp. 1079 (W.D. Va. 1982).
· cites it 3× “1977) that Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia, was a navigable water of the United States under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and was not exempt under 33 U.S.C. § 59 (7) from Corps’ regulatory jurisdiction over construction of piers and wharves therein.”
Loving v. Alexander, 745 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1984).
“§ 403 because of the exemption from such permit requirements under 33 U.S.C. § 59 1. State Water Control Board v.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Alexander, 613 F.2d 1054 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
“Water Resources Development Act of 1976, § 154 (codified at 33 U.S.C. § 59 / (1976)). 21 NWF and the federal defendants argue that Congress, in addressing these particular aspects of the Corps’ expanded regulations but not affirmatively reinstating the requirement of an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.