33 U.S.C. § 736
Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, § 20, 63 Stat. 561
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1947–1956 · leading case: Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United States, 138 F. Supp. 16 (S.D.N.Y. 1956).
Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United States, 138 F. Supp. 16 (S.D.N.Y. 1956). “This statutory duty was said to be that imposed by title 33 U.S.C. § 736 , 50 Stat. 666 , § 4676, as it existed at the time of the accident.”
Petition of Anthony O'Boyle, Inc., 161 F.2d 966 (2d Cir. 1947). “743 , but we feel that *968 a distinction may be drawn between (1) a request to the authorized government agency, 33 U.S.C.A. § 736 , and (2) a request to a private company which, by such request, becomes the agent of the owner so that the agent’s delay in marking the wreck…”
United States v. Travis, 165 F.2d 546 (4th Cir. 1947). “Under the title “Placement of markers over sunken crafts and other obstructions,” 33 U.S.C.A. § 736 , as amended August 16, 1937, reads: “Whenever the owner of any sunken vessel, boat, watercraft, raft, or other similar obstruction existing on any river, lake, harbor, sound,…”
Somerset Seafood Co. v. United States, 95 F. Supp. 298 (D. Maryland 1951). “” The Commandant of the Coast Guard in the same letter advised that it would cost about $30,000 to build a lighthouse, that if the Corps of Engineers desired to replace the buoy with a lighthouse the Coast Guard would do the work on a reimbursable basis under the provisions of…”
Allen N. Spooner & Sons, Inc. v. Gardner, 80 F. Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 1948). “The statutory discretionary authority of the Coast Guard to mark, 33 U.S.C.A. § 736 , is of a quality superior to that of the owner's authority which is derived from his obligation and when exercised supersedes the owner’s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.