40 U.S.C. § 406
TREATMENT AS PROPERTIES TRANSFERRED TO ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL AS PART OF CAPITOL BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS.
“Upon transfer to the Architect of the Capitol of title to, or administrative jurisdiction over, any property pursuant to this Act, the property shall be a part of the United States Capitol Grounds and shall be subject to sections 9, 9A, 9B, 9C, 14, and 16(b) of the Act entitled ‘An Act to define the area of the United States Capitol Grounds, to regulate the use thereof, and for other purposes’ [2 U.S.C. 1961, 1966, 1967, 1922, 1969, 1961 note] (relating to the policing of the United States Capitol Grounds) and sections 5101 to 5107 and 5109 of title 40, United States Code (relating to prohibited acts within the United States Capitol Grounds).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1934–1946 · leading case: Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. City of Indep., Kan., 79 F.2d 32 (10th Cir. 1935).
Kansas Gas & Elec. Co. v. City of Indep., Kan., 79 F.2d 32 (10th Cir. 1935). “Section 206 (40 USCA § 406) limits the projects to which loans or grants may be made by imposing restrictions calculated to increase employment.”
Greenwood Cnty. v. Duke Power Co., 81 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1936). “" Section 206 ( 40 U.S.C.A. § 406 ) provides: "All contracts let for construction projects and all loans and grants pursuant to this title [chapter] shall contain such provisions as are necessary to insure (1) that no convict labor shall be employed on any such project; (2) that…”
McShain v. United States, 65 F. Supp. 589 (Ct. Cl. 1946). “These increased costs were reasonable and were incurred and paid in connection with and by reason of defendant’s order of September 14, that all operations under the contract be converted to a Public Works Administration operation under section 206 of the National Industrial…”
Montana State Fed'n of Labor v. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 7 F. Supp. 82 (D. Mont. 1934). “and donate or givei government or the people’s money to construct publie works; that so far as practicable no employee thereon shall work more than thirty hours per week, and “that all employees shall be paid just and reasonable wages which shall be compensation sufficient to…”
Benoit v. Am. Mut. Liab. Ins., 162 So. 603 (La. Ct. App. 1935). “Section 206 of the act (40 USCA § 406) contains a provision which,, so far as pertinent, reads as follows: “so far as practicable and feasible, no individual directly employed on any such project shall be permitted to work more than thirty hours in any one week.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.