Notes of Decisions
Menocal v. Geo Grp., Inc., 113 F. Supp. 3d 1125 (D. Colo. 2015).
· cites it 2× “” 41 U.S.C. § 6703 (2); see also American Waste Removal Co.”
Tri-Cnty. Contractors, Inc. v. Thomas Perez, 155 F. Supp. 3d 81 (D.D.C. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See 41 U.S.C. § 6703 ; 29 C.F.R. § 4.6 . Among other things, each such contract must specify “the minimum wage to be paid to each class of service employee.”
Garcia v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc., 324 F. Supp. 3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“See 41 U.S.C. § 6703 . Challenges to the Department's classification and wage-setting decisions are channeled administratively through the Department's Wage and Hour Division and Wage Appeals Board.”
Bailey v. Dejoy, No. 1:20-cv-00042 (D. Me. Feb. 26, 2021).
· cites it 4× “§ 2000e-16; (4) the Service Contract Act, 41 U.S.C. § 6703 ; (5) the whistleblower protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.”
BAE Sys. Tech. Solutions & Servs. Inc., No. 63218, 63219 (A.S.B.C.A. July 29, 2024).
· cites it 3× “41 U.S.C. § 6703 (1), (2). DOL determines these minimum wages and fringe benefits in a wage determination based on either (1) those prevailing in the locality, or (2) as set forth in an applicable CBA which includes “prospective fringe benefit increases provided for in the…”
HD Inc., No. 63794 (A.S.B.C.A. Mar. 24, 2025).
· cites it 3× “41 U.S.C. § 6703 (1), (2); Lear Siegler Servs.”
Holstad v. United States Dep't of Labor, No. 0:20-cv-01867 (D. Minn. July 30, 2021).
· cites it 2× “177 (c)(1); see 41 U.S.C. § 6703 (2) (providing that the obligation to provide fringe benefits may be satisfied “by furnishing any equivalent combinations of fringe benefits or by making equivalent or differential payments in cash under regulations established by the Secretary”).”
Gov't Contracting Resources, Inc., ASBCA No. 59162 (A.S.B.C.A. Mar. 12, 2015).
· cites it 2× “41 U.S.C. § 6703 ; FAR 52.222-4l(c). Additionally, contractors are subject to a rule that requires successor contractors not to pay less than a predecessor paid under its CBA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.