42 U.S.C. § 1002

Qualified individuals

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, an individual—(1) who has attained the age of 65 on or before December 14, 1999;(2) who is a World War II veteran;(3) who is eligible for a supplemental security income benefit under subchapter XVI for—(A) the month in which this subchapter is enacted; and(B) the month in which the individual files an application for benefits under this subchapter;(4) whose total benefit income is less than 75 percent of the Federal benefit rate under subchapter XVI;(5) who has filed an application for benefits under this subchapter; and(6) who is in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Commissioner of Social Security under this subchapter,shall be a qualified individual for purposes of this subchapter.(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VIII, § 802, as added Pub. L. 106–169, title II, § 251(a), Dec. 14, 1999, 113 Stat. 1844.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

For prior provisions, see note set out under section 1001 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1939–2023 · leading case: Cent. States, Se. v. Mcnamara Motor Exp., 503 F. Supp. 96 (W.D. Mich. 1980).
Cent. States, Se. v. Mcnamara Motor Exp., 503 F. Supp. 96 (W.D. Mich. 1980). “” “Party in interest” is defined in Section 3(14), 42 U.S.C. § 1002 (14), which reads in part: “(14) The term ‘party in interest’ means, as to an employee benefit plan- ****** (C) an employer any of whose employees are covered by such plan .”
In re Frank, 25 F. Supp. 1005 (S.D.N.Y. 1939). “By section 802, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1002 , the tax “shall be collected by the employer of the taxpayer, by deducting the amount of the tax from the wages as and when paid.”
Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Rothensies, 45 F. Supp. 55 (E.D. Pa. 1942). “1935, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1002 (b) and 1005. *57 In addition to the stipulated facts, the court makes the following special findings of fact: 9.”
Greist v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 2:20-cv-05134 (E.D. Pa. May 25, 2023). “See 42 U.S.C. § 1002 . Accordingly, this Court declines to remand this matter on the basis of a purported violation of the Rehabilitation Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.