42 U.S.C. § 101
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘Alaska Power Administration Asset Sale and Termination Act’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: City of Wichita, Kansas v. Trs. of APCO Oil Corp. Liquidating Trust, 306 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (D. Kan. 2003).
City of Wichita, Kansas v. Trs. of APCO Oil Corp. Liquidating Trust, 306 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (D. Kan. 2003). “107-118 shows that Title I did not amend 42 U.S.C. § 101 (35). Instead, sections (35)(A) and (35)(B) were amended under Title II of Pub.”
Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc., 919 F. Supp. 662 (S.D.N.Y. 1996). “Section 101(27) defines "United States" and "State” to "include the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, and any other…”
United States v. P.R. Indus. Dev. Co., 287 F. Supp. 3d 133 (2017). “" 42 U.S.C. § 101 . Cis-1, 2-DCE and TCE, the two compounds located on the property, are classified as "hazardous substances" pursuant to section 101(4) of CERCLA.”
United States v. Hardage, 761 F. Supp. 1501 (W.D. Okla. 1990). “42 U.S.C. § 101 (20)(B). CERCLA section 101(20)(C) provides: (C) In the case of a hazardous substance which has been delivered by a common or contract carrier to a disposal or treatment facility and except as provided in section 9607(a)(3) or (4) of this title (i) the term…”
Jersey City Redevelopment Auth. v. PRG Indus., 655 F. Supp. 1257 (D.N.J. 1987). “42 U.S.C. § 101 (35)(A)(i) (as added by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub.”
Mercado v. Hyannis Air Serv., Inc. (1st Cir. 2025). “§ 2601 ; (3) the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 42 U.S.C. § 101 ; (4) the Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.”
West v. Town of Jupiter Island, 146 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (S.D. Fla. 2001). “DISCUSSION This action stems both from the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 101 , et. seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (“FCRA”), Fla.”
Indiana State High. Comm'n v. Ziliak, 431 N.E.2d 842 (Ind. Ct. App. 1982). “1977) holding that highway construction projects constituting ‘major federal action’ require complainee [sic] with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., by submitting of an environmental impact statement consisting of findings obtained through…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.