U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 84— DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— TRANSFERS OF FUNCTIONS

42 U.S.C. § 103

SALE OF EKLUTNA AND SNETTISHAM HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Sale of Eklutna.—The Secretary of Energy is authorized and directed to sell Eklutna to the Eklutna Purchasers in accordance with the terms of this Act and the Eklutna Purchase Agreement.“(b)Sale of Snettisham.—The Secretary of Energy is authorized and directed to sell Snettisham to the Snettisham Purchaser in accordance with the terms of this Act and the Snettisham Purchase Agreement.“(c)Cooperation of Other Agencies.—The heads of other Federal departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the United States shall assist the Secretary of Energy in implementing the sales and conveyances authorized and directed by this title.“(d)Proceeds.—Proceeds from the sales required by this title shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of miscellaneous receipts.“(e)Authorization of Appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to prepare, survey, and acquire Eklutna and Snettisham for sale and conveyance. Such preparations and acquisitions shall provide sufficient title to ensure the beneficial use, enjoyment, and occupancy by the purchasers.“(f)Contributed Funds.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Alaska Power Administration is authorized to receive, administer, and expend such contributed funds as may be provided by the Eklutna Purchasers or customers or the Snettisham Purchaser or customers for the purposes of upgrading, improving, maintaining, or administering Eklutna or Snettisham. Upon the termination of the Alaska Power Administration under section 104(f), the Secretary of Energy shall administer and expend any remaining balances of such contributed funds for the purposes intended by the contributors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2023 · leading case: Abbo-Bradley v. City of Niagara Falls, 73 F.4th 143 (2d Cir. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Abbo-Bradley v. City of Niagara Falls, 73 F.4th 143 (2d Cir. 2023). “CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this case, defendants-appellants are the City of Niagara Falls ("Niagara Falls"), its water board, and various companies (collectively, "Defendants") tasked with remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,…”
Lozar v. Birds Eye Foods, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 2d 589 (W.D. Mich. 2009). “As to any claim for negligence per se based on violations of CERCLA, BEF points out that the Lozars cite only the general liability provision of CERCLA, see 2d Am Comp ¶418 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 103 (1)), rather than specifying any one of the 28 sections of the pertinent…”
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. City of Yakima (E.D. Wash. 2022). “It asserts that the City is liable as an “owner” of the landfill 9 “facility” to which there have been releases or threatened releases of hazardous 10 substances, and therefore, it is a liable party under the Comprehensive 11 Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.